30 years ago today, (well, now I guess yesterday) Star Wars was released.
It was released on an absurdly small number of screens due to the fact that the studio releasing it assumed that it was going to bomb.
They weren't the only ones.
Before it was scheduled to be released, George Lucas showed the film to some of his closest friends. (Now to be fair, it wasn't yet completed when he showed it to them, some of the special effects still had to be added. Instead of the space battle scenes, for instance, there were scenes of World War II fighter planes in battle, which I'm sure looked kinda cheesy.)
Resoundingly, those friends hated the film. His own wife said it would be a failure, comparing it to a well known bomb at the time. In modern language she would have said something to the effect of "it's the sci-fi Gigli."
Only Lucas's friend Stephen Spielberg had anything pleasant to say when he correctly predicted it would be unbelievably huge.
Lucas himself wasn't convinced however, and went so far as to be on vacation and unreachable thirty years ago today. He didn't want to have to hear about what a flop his extremely personal film had turned out to be.
Of course, in the theaters lucky enough to be showing it, the exact opposite was in fact true as lines were leading out blocks away as people waited to see it. Ultimately it would become the highest grossing film of all time.
It also had a lot to do with making me who I am today. I became a writer because of Star Wars, or more precisely, Empire Strikes Back. I was three when Empire was released in theaters, which means I had to wait an additional three years (or the entirety of the life I had lived to that point) in order find out what the hell happened to Han Solo.
Since waiting three years (and again, I'd only been alive for three years at that point, so this seemed like an eternity) was clearly unacceptable I began writing in my head various versions of Return of the Jedi, even going so far as to put myself in the exact position that Solo had been frozen into whenever I was in the bathtub. (My own version of method acting, I suppose.)
At any rate, that event (along with many other factors, granted) went a long way towards my realization that I wanted to write and make movies myself some day. So, today, I thank George Lucas for introducing us to that Galaxy far, far away.
Speaking of movies, two were released today, Pirates 3 and Bug. I saw them both.
Bug was brilliant. However, it is very different from the movie that has been advertised. If you go in expecting to see something in the vain of Saw or Hostel, you will be disappointed, as evidenced by the huge exodus of people about halfway through the movie. (Can't say I'm sorry that a lot of them left, however, since all that they were doing was disrupting the viewing for everyone else.)
If instead you go in with an open mind, I think you'll be very pleasantly surprised. The movie was based on a play, and the adaptation doesn't stray far from its source material as much of the film takes place in a rundown motel room. Due in part to the story and in part to the wonderful camera work, the single set doesn't get a bit tiring. While one could classify this film as a horror movie, it is much more then that. It is a psychological character study that takes you into the disturbing world of the two main characters played superbly by Ashley Judd and the relatively unknown (in film anyway, he also played the same character on stage in New York and London) Michael Shannon. The acting in this film (by both of the main characters and by Harry Connick Jr. in a supporting role) are worth the price of admission by itself. I highly recommend it.
Honestly, I wasn't going to see Pirates of the Caribbean 3. If I hadn't gone to the movies with a girl who wanted to see it, I probably wouldn't have. However, I was pleasantly surprised. Personally, I loved the first one and detested the second. The third was likable. It wasn't anywhere near as good as the first, but seemed to recapture some of the magic that the first one had. Sure there were parts of it that were tedious (like the majority of the second film) and it was unnecessarily complicated, but there was a lot of it that was just plain fun (like the majority of the first film.)
In the interest of telling the whole truth, I was tempted to walk out early on in the film, but once Johnny Depp
Until Next Time, May the Force Be With You... Always
Saturday, May 26, 2007
Thursday, May 24, 2007
LOST Through the Looking Glass, first thoughts
Wow. Okay, here's what we know for sure. It is possible to get off of the island. At least Jack and Kate do.
What we don't know...
What is the Island, Where is the Island, When is the Island? (I think this last question is extremely important.)
Let me first say, at the very first "flashback", I believed it was actually a flash-forward. And stuck with that until the moment Jack told the new chief doctor to get his dad down there, but, after all we'd seen him walking around on the island, right, he could still be alive. The Island cured Rose, cured Locke, and allowed Jin to have a baby, couldn't it conceivably have brought Jack's dad back to life as well? So I wasn't too surprised to see Kate meet Jack.
Now, of course, everything has changed.
What does the show become? Do we go to the future? Does it become about Jack trying to get back to the Island? Does it pick up on the island with the rescue and we see how Jack gets to this point?
Either are possible.
Important things to keep in mind: one, they supposedly found the plane and there were no survivors. Okay, this info came from Naomi, and I'm not sure how much she can be trusted since Penny claimed to have never heard of her. But somehow she knew about Desmond and Penny, and somehow she knew a little bit about Charlie, at least. Is it possible that Benry Gale isn't the most evil person our Losties can meet up with? That perhaps there is a more sinister force (that Benry Gale really feels are the "bad guys") out there with far more information about the island and the plane? I think that it's likely. Two, not only is Jack's dad still alive in the Flash Forward, but Kate is not (apparently) a fugitive. Three, Jack says to Kate, I'm tired of lying or something to that effect (as Locke says, I'm going to have to watch that again), what did he mean by that? And, finally four, at the viewing, when asked if he is a friend or a relative, Jack says neither. If, assuming as I am, the viewing was for someone else on that plane, why does Jack not say friend?
Okay, now, it has only been about 25 minutes since the episode ended, and I'm still theorizing as I'm writing, so a lot of this isn't as developed as it will be once I think a little more on it, and talk to a few more people. But here are my new theories...
1. The show picks back up on the island, but instead of flash backs, we start to get flash forwards to a possible (maybe even certain) future. For instance, we start on the island right where we left off, but there are still some things to be done in order to get everyone off. There are still all of the other Others, who might have something to say about it, and we know Locke doesn't want to go. Was that really Walt or the Island/Jacob manifesting itself/himself as Walt. If the Island/Jacob doesn't want them to go, isn't there more it can do to at least stall them? I believe so, and it won't be super simple to get off of the Island, so we'll get episodes on the Island interspersed with flash forwards to what happens after the Island.
2. I believe that the Island is in another Dimension. I believe that in the dimension that our Losties are from, Oceanic Flight 815 really did crash and they really did find all of the survivors dead. I believe that it's possible, in the right circumstances, for you to die in our reality, but simultaneously appear on the Island. So that brings up the question (if I'm right in Theory 2) of how is the found plane and dead bodies explained away with the reappearance to his former life of one Dr. Jack Shepard?
3. I believe that in order to get off of the Island some sort of dimensional travel is involved, which only makes sense since I believe that the Island itself is in a separate dimension. Now, with dimensional travel (according to some theories in physics) there is also time travel. In order to get everyone off of the Island, Dr. Jack is going to be offered, I think, some sort of deal. It will involve going back in time before the flight happened. It will involve going back to their lives as they left them before the circumstances that caused them all to get on the flight.
4. Okay, we have been shown in the flashbacks these last three seasons the fact that everyone on that flight was somehow connected far more then your usual "6 degrees". In the recap episode "The_Answers" we were told that the connections are part of what caused everyone to be on that flight. In other words, it wasn't an accident that got those exact people on that exact flight. The creators used the example of Anthony Cooper, Locke's father. If not for his actions, Locke would not have become the man that he did, and Sawyer certainly wouldn't have become the man that he did. By conning Sawyer's parents (and causing their death) and by throwing Locke out of an 8 story window (and paralyzing him) he led directly to the events that put each of them on that plane. Locke was trying to prove he could still be someone productive despite his paralysis, and Sawyer following a lead that he thought would take him to the man that killed his parents. It isn't too big a step to think that if the events don't lead to the right people getting on that plane, then that plane won't crash.
5. So, this is explained to, at least, Dr. Jack and Kate, and most likely one other whose funeral it is that Dr. Jack goes to. They go back to the past and have to make decisions that change whatever the reason is that they would have gotten on that plane. And in doing that, the plane never crashes. That means, that they save EVERYONE. Not just the other Losties that are still alive, but everyone who perished in the crash as well. And everyone who has died since they survived the crash. Eko, Ana-Lucia, Libby, Boone, Shannon, and Charlie would be alive. How could Jack not agree to this. Of course it would mean that only they (at least Jack and Kate) would remember. In addition to their lives back, they get passes allowing them to fly free wherever they desire.
I know, that's the big one, theory number five. Let me give you some of the reasons I came to this conclusion. Jack says that he's tired of lying. This would explain that. What might happen if everyone were returned to before the crash? Well, Charlie would still be addicted to drugs, and nowhere near the fame he thinks he desires. Of course we know what he really desires, but we also know without the crash he doesn't really have any hope of achieving it. And I think he was resigned to his death, he definitely didn't go into it blindly. Which do you think he'd prefer, having died a hero and having known and loved Claire and Aaron, or continuing in his drug addled unfulfilled life as a former rock star? Eko would still be a fake priest living with that guilt as well as the guilt of having killed his brother. He came to terms with his past actions due to the Island, but I'm not sure he could have gotten there without it. Rose would still have cancer. Sun and Jin would still be in a horrible and unhealthy marriage. Boone would still be helplessly in love with his step-sister, and she would still be using it to torment him. I could go on and on, the point is that the experience of the crash has actually improved these peoples lives. If they were placed back in those lives with no memories of the crash and their experiences there, they are right back into those awful situations.
Now we know that Dr. Jack and Kate at least still remember what happened to them, right? So, one could assume that their lives are better because of what they've learned. Obviously not, in Dr. Jack's case at least. He's bottomed out. A huge low, even for him. What could have brought this on? If I'm right, he had to change the decision that led to him getting on that plane. That means he had to keep from getting his dad fired. If his dad doesn't get fired from the Hospital, then he doesn't drink himself to death in Sidney, Jack doesn't have to go get his body, and they don't crash. Plus this would explain how Jack's dad is still alive.
Okay, Kate. If she isn't a fugitive, she can't get caught and brought on board the flight. Therefore, she can't kill her stepfather. Now, remember, not only was he hurting Kate's mom, but it appeared he had the hots for Kate as well. If he's not dead, couldn't he have some hold on her. Enough that when she goes to meet Jack, she has to say to him, I've got to get back before he notices? I'm betting that she was referring to her Stepfather.
That brings us to the mystery person, the one with the funeral. I think they know as well. So, who are they? Well, Jack goes and answers the man's question of friend or family with neither. There's really only one person that would elicit that response from Jack. Sawyer.
Not only that, but he was hoping that Kate would be there. (No doubt they've had a falling out, however. It was pretty well foreshadowed in the episode that a Kate/Sawyer falling out was in the cards.) If Sawyer's back in his previous life, all he has to do is not go kill the person that wasn't the real Sawyer anyway. Easy enough. But that doesn't change the fact that he's not in a good position, and there are no shortage of people that want him dead, even with a memory of everything that happened, and the knowledge of who the real Sawyer actually is.
Now, Jack has gotten everyone safely home, but what if while using the pass to fly all over the place, he starts reconnecting with the other people who were supposed to be on that plane. They would have no idea who he is, of course, but he would know them. He would begin to see what horrible shape they were all in, especially the people who died on the Island. He would begin to understand that they would be better off having died there then living the lives that they had left behind. Perhaps he would come to understand that they had died as better people on the Island, and because of the Island, then they ever could hope for if they hadn't had that experience.
With me so far? Okay, the obvious question becomes why don't Kate and Jack end up getting together? They both know what really happened, and they clearly feel for each other. This, one would think, would especially happen if there was a big falling out in the Kate/Sawyer relationship. My theory is that the trip back in time also gives Jack the chance to fix the relationship with his ex-wife. He goes back to before they get divorced. Benry Gale asks him what he has to go back for, his wife had left him for another man, but what if the trip back took him to before that happened. We know how much Dr. Jack likes to fix things, don't you think that this would be something he couldn't resist? Now, we know that it doesn't work, we see that in the Flash-Forwards. Failing at his marriage again, when he knows that the trouble is coming this time, combined with the state of affairs that all of the other former Losties' lives are in, and finally the death of one of the only other two people who knows what really happened cause his to finally hit rock bottom.
These are my thoughts. Can't wait to talk to more people, see what they think. Once again, however, this show has changed everything. The fact that this theory is so completely different than anything I had previously posted or even thought about, shows you how amazing this show has the capability of being. Whether my theories prove to be completely, partially, or not at all correct doesn't change the fact that I'm glad I've been along for the ride so far and can't wait to take the rest of the way. 48 more episodes until everything is made clear.
Until Next Time, I'll see you in February LOST.
What we don't know...
What is the Island, Where is the Island, When is the Island? (I think this last question is extremely important.)
Let me first say, at the very first "flashback", I believed it was actually a flash-forward. And stuck with that until the moment Jack told the new chief doctor to get his dad down there, but, after all we'd seen him walking around on the island, right, he could still be alive. The Island cured Rose, cured Locke, and allowed Jin to have a baby, couldn't it conceivably have brought Jack's dad back to life as well? So I wasn't too surprised to see Kate meet Jack.
Now, of course, everything has changed.
What does the show become? Do we go to the future? Does it become about Jack trying to get back to the Island? Does it pick up on the island with the rescue and we see how Jack gets to this point?
Either are possible.
Important things to keep in mind: one, they supposedly found the plane and there were no survivors. Okay, this info came from Naomi, and I'm not sure how much she can be trusted since Penny claimed to have never heard of her. But somehow she knew about Desmond and Penny, and somehow she knew a little bit about Charlie, at least. Is it possible that Benry Gale isn't the most evil person our Losties can meet up with? That perhaps there is a more sinister force (that Benry Gale really feels are the "bad guys") out there with far more information about the island and the plane? I think that it's likely. Two, not only is Jack's dad still alive in the Flash Forward, but Kate is not (apparently) a fugitive. Three, Jack says to Kate, I'm tired of lying or something to that effect (as Locke says, I'm going to have to watch that again), what did he mean by that? And, finally four, at the viewing, when asked if he is a friend or a relative, Jack says neither. If, assuming as I am, the viewing was for someone else on that plane, why does Jack not say friend?
Okay, now, it has only been about 25 minutes since the episode ended, and I'm still theorizing as I'm writing, so a lot of this isn't as developed as it will be once I think a little more on it, and talk to a few more people. But here are my new theories...
1. The show picks back up on the island, but instead of flash backs, we start to get flash forwards to a possible (maybe even certain) future. For instance, we start on the island right where we left off, but there are still some things to be done in order to get everyone off. There are still all of the other Others, who might have something to say about it, and we know Locke doesn't want to go. Was that really Walt or the Island/Jacob manifesting itself/himself as Walt. If the Island/Jacob doesn't want them to go, isn't there more it can do to at least stall them? I believe so, and it won't be super simple to get off of the Island, so we'll get episodes on the Island interspersed with flash forwards to what happens after the Island.
2. I believe that the Island is in another Dimension. I believe that in the dimension that our Losties are from, Oceanic Flight 815 really did crash and they really did find all of the survivors dead. I believe that it's possible, in the right circumstances, for you to die in our reality, but simultaneously appear on the Island. So that brings up the question (if I'm right in Theory 2) of how is the found plane and dead bodies explained away with the reappearance to his former life of one Dr. Jack Shepard?
3. I believe that in order to get off of the Island some sort of dimensional travel is involved, which only makes sense since I believe that the Island itself is in a separate dimension. Now, with dimensional travel (according to some theories in physics) there is also time travel. In order to get everyone off of the Island, Dr. Jack is going to be offered, I think, some sort of deal. It will involve going back in time before the flight happened. It will involve going back to their lives as they left them before the circumstances that caused them all to get on the flight.
4. Okay, we have been shown in the flashbacks these last three seasons the fact that everyone on that flight was somehow connected far more then your usual "6 degrees". In the recap episode "The_Answers" we were told that the connections are part of what caused everyone to be on that flight. In other words, it wasn't an accident that got those exact people on that exact flight. The creators used the example of Anthony Cooper, Locke's father. If not for his actions, Locke would not have become the man that he did, and Sawyer certainly wouldn't have become the man that he did. By conning Sawyer's parents (and causing their death) and by throwing Locke out of an 8 story window (and paralyzing him) he led directly to the events that put each of them on that plane. Locke was trying to prove he could still be someone productive despite his paralysis, and Sawyer following a lead that he thought would take him to the man that killed his parents. It isn't too big a step to think that if the events don't lead to the right people getting on that plane, then that plane won't crash.
5. So, this is explained to, at least, Dr. Jack and Kate, and most likely one other whose funeral it is that Dr. Jack goes to. They go back to the past and have to make decisions that change whatever the reason is that they would have gotten on that plane. And in doing that, the plane never crashes. That means, that they save EVERYONE. Not just the other Losties that are still alive, but everyone who perished in the crash as well. And everyone who has died since they survived the crash. Eko, Ana-Lucia, Libby, Boone, Shannon, and Charlie would be alive. How could Jack not agree to this. Of course it would mean that only they (at least Jack and Kate) would remember. In addition to their lives back, they get passes allowing them to fly free wherever they desire.
I know, that's the big one, theory number five. Let me give you some of the reasons I came to this conclusion. Jack says that he's tired of lying. This would explain that. What might happen if everyone were returned to before the crash? Well, Charlie would still be addicted to drugs, and nowhere near the fame he thinks he desires. Of course we know what he really desires, but we also know without the crash he doesn't really have any hope of achieving it. And I think he was resigned to his death, he definitely didn't go into it blindly. Which do you think he'd prefer, having died a hero and having known and loved Claire and Aaron, or continuing in his drug addled unfulfilled life as a former rock star? Eko would still be a fake priest living with that guilt as well as the guilt of having killed his brother. He came to terms with his past actions due to the Island, but I'm not sure he could have gotten there without it. Rose would still have cancer. Sun and Jin would still be in a horrible and unhealthy marriage. Boone would still be helplessly in love with his step-sister, and she would still be using it to torment him. I could go on and on, the point is that the experience of the crash has actually improved these peoples lives. If they were placed back in those lives with no memories of the crash and their experiences there, they are right back into those awful situations.
Now we know that Dr. Jack and Kate at least still remember what happened to them, right? So, one could assume that their lives are better because of what they've learned. Obviously not, in Dr. Jack's case at least. He's bottomed out. A huge low, even for him. What could have brought this on? If I'm right, he had to change the decision that led to him getting on that plane. That means he had to keep from getting his dad fired. If his dad doesn't get fired from the Hospital, then he doesn't drink himself to death in Sidney, Jack doesn't have to go get his body, and they don't crash. Plus this would explain how Jack's dad is still alive.
Okay, Kate. If she isn't a fugitive, she can't get caught and brought on board the flight. Therefore, she can't kill her stepfather. Now, remember, not only was he hurting Kate's mom, but it appeared he had the hots for Kate as well. If he's not dead, couldn't he have some hold on her. Enough that when she goes to meet Jack, she has to say to him, I've got to get back before he notices? I'm betting that she was referring to her Stepfather.
That brings us to the mystery person, the one with the funeral. I think they know as well. So, who are they? Well, Jack goes and answers the man's question of friend or family with neither. There's really only one person that would elicit that response from Jack. Sawyer.
Not only that, but he was hoping that Kate would be there. (No doubt they've had a falling out, however. It was pretty well foreshadowed in the episode that a Kate/Sawyer falling out was in the cards.) If Sawyer's back in his previous life, all he has to do is not go kill the person that wasn't the real Sawyer anyway. Easy enough. But that doesn't change the fact that he's not in a good position, and there are no shortage of people that want him dead, even with a memory of everything that happened, and the knowledge of who the real Sawyer actually is.
Now, Jack has gotten everyone safely home, but what if while using the pass to fly all over the place, he starts reconnecting with the other people who were supposed to be on that plane. They would have no idea who he is, of course, but he would know them. He would begin to see what horrible shape they were all in, especially the people who died on the Island. He would begin to understand that they would be better off having died there then living the lives that they had left behind. Perhaps he would come to understand that they had died as better people on the Island, and because of the Island, then they ever could hope for if they hadn't had that experience.
With me so far? Okay, the obvious question becomes why don't Kate and Jack end up getting together? They both know what really happened, and they clearly feel for each other. This, one would think, would especially happen if there was a big falling out in the Kate/Sawyer relationship. My theory is that the trip back in time also gives Jack the chance to fix the relationship with his ex-wife. He goes back to before they get divorced. Benry Gale asks him what he has to go back for, his wife had left him for another man, but what if the trip back took him to before that happened. We know how much Dr. Jack likes to fix things, don't you think that this would be something he couldn't resist? Now, we know that it doesn't work, we see that in the Flash-Forwards. Failing at his marriage again, when he knows that the trouble is coming this time, combined with the state of affairs that all of the other former Losties' lives are in, and finally the death of one of the only other two people who knows what really happened cause his to finally hit rock bottom.
These are my thoughts. Can't wait to talk to more people, see what they think. Once again, however, this show has changed everything. The fact that this theory is so completely different than anything I had previously posted or even thought about, shows you how amazing this show has the capability of being. Whether my theories prove to be completely, partially, or not at all correct doesn't change the fact that I'm glad I've been along for the ride so far and can't wait to take the rest of the way. 48 more episodes until everything is made clear.
Until Next Time, I'll see you in February LOST.
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
LOST One of Us, first thoughts
We found out last week that no babies could be born on the island, but Benry Gale has said before that he has been on the island his whole life; how is that possible if no one can be born on the island?
Entertainment Weekly has an article on LOST in the current issue, and it talks about the Nikki/Paulo debacle. Apparently, there was going to be a longer arc concerning the characters, but due to fan backlash against them, they decided to pull the plug on them.
That's just annoying. If you had something good set up with them, use it and make us change our minds. Don't just give in because everyone is complaining about them online.
Until Next Time, This has been an uneven season so far. A majority of the episodes have been better then anything last season, some have been better then even season one, but a couple have been just plan awful. It looks headed to a strong finish though.
Entertainment Weekly has an article on LOST in the current issue, and it talks about the Nikki/Paulo debacle. Apparently, there was going to be a longer arc concerning the characters, but due to fan backlash against them, they decided to pull the plug on them.
That's just annoying. If you had something good set up with them, use it and make us change our minds. Don't just give in because everyone is complaining about them online.
Until Next Time, This has been an uneven season so far. A majority of the episodes have been better then anything last season, some have been better then even season one, but a couple have been just plan awful. It looks headed to a strong finish though.
Sunday, April 8, 2007
Zodiac
Just saw Zodiac and it is amazing. It's very rare for a film that came out in March to be this good. Unfortunately, I don't think many people went and saw this film, I had to go to Angelika to see it, but I'm so glad that I did. For a movie about a serial killer case that has officially never been closed, there is still closure for the film and the film remains truthful to the material on which it is based. But this film is about so much more than a serial killer, it is about obsession and what that obsession can do to a life. The effect this case had on so many people is what makes this film so fascinating to watch.
Apparently, Fincher had a tough time finishing the film (otherwise it might have been released late last year putting it in award contention and in what would have been number 3 on my top ten although it's currently number 1 for 2007 so far) and ultimately cut thirty minutes off of the film to get it to the 2:35 mark. I wish he had just made it a 3 hour movie, because as it was it didn't feel long at all. I personally can't wait for the DVD, to see the deleted scenes.
Hopefully the March release date won't hurt this film when it comes back to awards season, because this is a film incredibly worthy of winning some.
Fincher's previous films include Seven, Fight Club, and Panic Room.
Until Next Time, Do yourself a favor go out and see this one while you still can.
Apparently, Fincher had a tough time finishing the film (otherwise it might have been released late last year putting it in award contention and in what would have been number 3 on my top ten although it's currently number 1 for 2007 so far) and ultimately cut thirty minutes off of the film to get it to the 2:35 mark. I wish he had just made it a 3 hour movie, because as it was it didn't feel long at all. I personally can't wait for the DVD, to see the deleted scenes.
Hopefully the March release date won't hurt this film when it comes back to awards season, because this is a film incredibly worthy of winning some.
Fincher's previous films include Seven, Fight Club, and Panic Room.
Until Next Time, Do yourself a favor go out and see this one while you still can.
Saturday, April 7, 2007
LOST Left Behind, first thoughts
Kate flashbacks are always good, and it was neat to see Fugitive Kate before she was any good at being a fugitive. Plus, an interesting connection made between Kate and Sawyer as she meets someone he has conned.
More importantly, the smoke monster made an appearance, and we learned that the Others'security system, which seemed so easy to get past a few episodes ago, actually serves to protect them from the smoke monster. Interesting.
So John Locke has apparently joined the Others now, that'll be fun to keep an eye on, but they will keep us in suspense a little while longer on that, until, I'm guessing, we find out the Sawyer from our Sawyer's past is none other than Locke's dad.
Speaking of Sawyer, that was some great stuff with him this week. My guess is he settles into his leader role nicely, probably just as Dr. Jack saunters back into camp. Amazingly, that's going to happen next week; no waiting for that. Maybe this means that the pointless episodes are over now.
The last little thing I'm liking is what's going on with Sun. After Charlie told her the truth, she has become completely angry with Sawyer. Remember earlier this season she killed one of the Others, but it was probably justified in her mind in part because of what she thought they had done to her. She has now found out they did nothing to her, and is therefore blaming Sawyer for turning her into a killer.
Until Next Time, hopefully the see-saw, Jekyll and Hyde, good one week bad the next, time is over and LOST can return to the strong show it once was and clearly is still capable of being.
More importantly, the smoke monster made an appearance, and we learned that the Others'
So John Locke has apparently joined the Others now, that'll be fun to keep an eye on, but they will keep us in suspense a little while longer on that, until, I'm guessing, we find out the Sawyer from our Sawyer's past is none other than Locke's dad.
Speaking of Sawyer, that was some great stuff with him this week. My guess is he settles into his leader role nicely, probably just as Dr. Jack saunters back into camp. Amazingly, that's going to happen next week; no waiting for that. Maybe this means that the pointless episodes are over now.
The last little thing I'm liking is what's going on with Sun. After Charlie told her the truth, she has become completely angry with Sawyer. Remember earlier this season she killed one of the Others, but it was probably justified in her mind in part because of what she thought they had done to her. She has now found out they did nothing to her, and is therefore blaming Sawyer for turning her into a killer.
Until Next Time, hopefully the see-saw, Jekyll and Hyde, good one week bad the next, time is over and LOST can return to the strong show it once was and clearly is still capable of being.
Thursday, April 5, 2007
LOST Expose, first thoughts
What a huge letdown.
When these characters were half-ass introduced in the mini-season, fans were upset. Mainly, I think, because the introduction was botched. It isn't as if we as fans are completely unwilling to allow any new characters. In fact many of the fan's favorite characters were added after season one. Benry Gale and Eko to name two. The intros of those characters, as well as many others, were handled extremely well; this was not the case with Nikki and Paulo.
But like it or not, the characters were here, and we were promised by the powers that be that we would come to like them once we knew their story.
Lies.
It turns out, their story was just a ploy to have a joke ending. Not a damn thing important occurred in that episode. Except perhaps for the fact that Sun's anger against the Others caused Charlie to come clean about his role in Sawyer's earlier power play. This could come into play in my theory about the island killing you in order to release you after your slate is clean. One more thing Charlie has atoned for, his death could actually be immanent. Other then that though, (which easily could have been accomplished elsewhere) this was a throwaway episode.
Until Next Time, I did at least like seeing Lando Calrissian.
When these characters were half-ass introduced in the mini-season, fans were upset. Mainly, I think, because the introduction was botched. It isn't as if we as fans are completely unwilling to allow any new characters. In fact many of the fan's favorite characters were added after season one. Benry Gale and Eko to name two. The intros of those characters, as well as many others, were handled extremely well; this was not the case with Nikki and Paulo.
But like it or not, the characters were here, and we were promised by the powers that be that we would come to like them once we knew their story.
Lies.
It turns out, their story was just a ploy to have a joke ending. Not a damn thing important occurred in that episode. Except perhaps for the fact that Sun's anger against the Others caused Charlie to come clean about his role in Sawyer's earlier power play. This could come into play in my theory about the island killing you in order to release you after your slate is clean. One more thing Charlie has atoned for, his death could actually be immanent. Other then that though, (which easily could have been accomplished elsewhere) this was a throwaway episode.
Until Next Time, I did at least like seeing Lando Calrissian.
Thursday, March 22, 2007
LOST The Man From Tallahassee, first thoughts
I have got to talk about the episode of LOST that aired tonight. While many of the episodes this season have been weak (especially in view of the heights this show reached in its first season) tonight's episode blew away (like an exploded submarine) anything this show had ever done previously. I'm truly at a loss for words, but as a writer, I will attempt to fight through it and say a little bit about what I thought.
There are spoilers ahead, so if you're behind on LOST you should stop reading.
Okay, first of all, the big question that was actually answered this week (because lately the show has been promising answers while delivering crap, the security system you just have to go over instead of anything on the smoke monster, or stuff we pretty much already knew, Claire's dad is Jack's dad) is how Locke got paralyzed, and there was potential for this to be a big letdown. To put it mildly this was the exact opposite of being a big letdown. First of all, we got more of the Locke and his father storyline which is one of the best flashbacks the show has to offer. To have his father be directly responsible for his paralysis and through trying to kill him, no less, added a huge dimension to Locke's character. One we will get to see through due to the fact that Benry Gale has Locke's dad locked up. I haven't been this excited about the show after an episode's conclusion since the first episode, which I watched on DVD, allowing me to go ahead and immediately watch the next one when necessary. Man I wish it was already next week.
Secondly, Benry Gale told us a little more about the island. I don't know if we can take the idea of the "magic box" that manifests your every desire 100% literally, but the idea at least is intriguing. It would also explain quite a lot, the Horse Kate saw and Charlie's miraculously undamaged guitar to name just a couple. One of the things that I've wondered is if this were strictly a sci-fi premise, in that there is a scientific (if possibly far-fetched) explanation for everything on the show, or if some part of the island was in some way mystical, I'll get to that in a bit.
Taking just the first two seasons into account, I was beginning to lean towards a completely scientific theory. In fact I put the beginnings of one forth earlier this season. I argued that the show was a purgatory themed experiment, troubled people (and every character is certainly that) are forced to face their mental demons and come to terms with who they are, after which they were given their freedom in the form of death. I made this argument based on the belief that there is no other way off of the island. We still aren't sure that there is another way off of the island. It's possible to get to the island, but are we sure that anyone has ever left it? In the "Not in Portland" episode that brought us back from hiatus, we saw Ethan off of the island, but isn't it possible that he was a recruit that had yet to get to the island when he was working on getting Juliet there? Benry Gale told John tonight that the submarine was a comfort for those he had recruited, a sign that they could leave if they wanted, even though, he hinted, that was a lie. Maybe it isn't that Benry feared he would appear weak if he let Dr. Jack go, but he feared the mutiny that would occur if the non-native Others then realized that they could never leave. The real hitch in this theory of course is Michael and Walt. What is their fate, a question that from what I've read won't be resolved until next season, but until the show tells me otherwise I'm sticking with the belief that they did not get safely away. I still like this theory, but now I believe that the island plays a larger (and more mystical) role.
I believe that Darmha planned on using the Island for experiments of some kind, but when they started their experiments, they were unclear on A) exactly what they were dealing with in terms of the island, and B) the fact that the island was already inhabited. The island allowed Darmha to set up its stations, including somehow tapping into the electromagnetic force of the island which caused the need for the button, but retaliated after Darmha's usefulness had ended by releasing some sort of virus that wiped out the remaining Initiative members, as well as the rest of Russeau's team.
Whether the Purgatory like experiments are taking place on behalf of whoever is in charge of the Others (Benry's hinted at boss) or by the Island itself remains to be seen, but the fact that the Island is somewhat mystically sentient seems clear to me now. (However each week everything has the potential to change.) The Island has its own purpose, as evidenced by John being out of a wheelchair, and Benry Gale being in one. It seems to either answer to a higher power then Benry Gale or to be a higher power into and of itself. Desmond's flashes and even Hurley's getting the van to start through pure faith could be further evidence of the Island's mystical power. Maybe Desmond needs to unlearn what he thinks he knows about the certainty of his visions in order to finally save Charlie's life; maybe he, like Locke before him needs to believe in the power of the Island.
These are some of the things tonight's episode caused me to think about. An interesting theory I read, which I believe gained credence in tonight's episode, is the theory that Locke's father is the real Sawyer, the con-man who caused the death of Cast-away Sawyer's parents and turned him into the man Sawyer/James Ford is today. While in earlier episodes we saw Locke's father perpetrate cons, he was never specifically referred to as a con-man until tonight. Not only that, but we also learned that he's changed his name at least once, so why couldn't he have at some point gone by the name of Sawyer? If this is true, then I fell like this character has some tough times ahead of him, because not only will he have to answer to Locke for his past deeds, but I have to believe Sawyer will get a shot at him as well.
Until Next Time, This season took a huge turn for the better tonight, and I am greatly looking forward to see where it is headed next. If you are behind on, or God forbid have never watched, LOST, what are you waiting for? The first two seasons are on DVD and the entirety of this season is available at abc.com.
There are spoilers ahead, so if you're behind on LOST you should stop reading.
Okay, first of all, the big question that was actually answered this week (because lately the show has been promising answers while delivering crap, the security system you just have to go over instead of anything on the smoke monster, or stuff we pretty much already knew, Claire's dad is Jack's dad) is how Locke got paralyzed, and there was potential for this to be a big letdown. To put it mildly this was the exact opposite of being a big letdown. First of all, we got more of the Locke and his father storyline which is one of the best flashbacks the show has to offer. To have his father be directly responsible for his paralysis and through trying to kill him, no less, added a huge dimension to Locke's character. One we will get to see through due to the fact that Benry Gale has Locke's dad locked up. I haven't been this excited about the show after an episode's conclusion since the first episode, which I watched on DVD, allowing me to go ahead and immediately watch the next one when necessary. Man I wish it was already next week.
Secondly, Benry Gale told us a little more about the island. I don't know if we can take the idea of the "magic box" that manifests your every desire 100% literally, but the idea at least is intriguing. It would also explain quite a lot, the Horse Kate saw and Charlie's miraculously undamaged guitar to name just a couple. One of the things that I've wondered is if this were strictly a sci-fi premise, in that there is a scientific (if possibly far-fetched) explanation for everything on the show, or if some part of the island was in some way mystical, I'll get to that in a bit.
Taking just the first two seasons into account, I was beginning to lean towards a completely scientific theory. In fact I put the beginnings of one forth earlier this season. I argued that the show was a purgatory themed experiment, troubled people (and every character is certainly that) are forced to face their mental demons and come to terms with who they are, after which they were given their freedom in the form of death. I made this argument based on the belief that there is no other way off of the island. We still aren't sure that there is another way off of the island. It's possible to get to the island, but are we sure that anyone has ever left it? In the "Not in Portland" episode that brought us back from hiatus, we saw Ethan off of the island, but isn't it possible that he was a recruit that had yet to get to the island when he was working on getting Juliet there? Benry Gale told John tonight that the submarine was a comfort for those he had recruited, a sign that they could leave if they wanted, even though, he hinted, that was a lie. Maybe it isn't that Benry feared he would appear weak if he let Dr. Jack go, but he feared the mutiny that would occur if the non-native Others then realized that they could never leave. The real hitch in this theory of course is Michael and Walt. What is their fate, a question that from what I've read won't be resolved until next season, but until the show tells me otherwise I'm sticking with the belief that they did not get safely away. I still like this theory, but now I believe that the island plays a larger (and more mystical) role.
I believe that Darmha planned on using the Island for experiments of some kind, but when they started their experiments, they were unclear on A) exactly what they were dealing with in terms of the island, and B) the fact that the island was already inhabited. The island allowed Darmha to set up its stations, including somehow tapping into the electromagnetic force of the island which caused the need for the button, but retaliated after Darmha's usefulness had ended by releasing some sort of virus that wiped out the remaining Initiative members, as well as the rest of Russeau's team.
Whether the Purgatory like experiments are taking place on behalf of whoever is in charge of the Others (Benry's hinted at boss) or by the Island itself remains to be seen, but the fact that the Island is somewhat mystically sentient seems clear to me now. (However each week everything has the potential to change.) The Island has its own purpose, as evidenced by John being out of a wheelchair, and Benry Gale being in one. It seems to either answer to a higher power then Benry Gale or to be a higher power into and of itself. Desmond's flashes and even Hurley's getting the van to start through pure faith could be further evidence of the Island's mystical power. Maybe Desmond needs to unlearn what he thinks he knows about the certainty of his visions in order to finally save Charlie's life; maybe he, like Locke before him needs to believe in the power of the Island.
These are some of the things tonight's episode caused me to think about. An interesting theory I read, which I believe gained credence in tonight's episode, is the theory that Locke's father is the real Sawyer, the con-man who caused the death of Cast-away Sawyer's parents and turned him into the man Sawyer/James Ford is today. While in earlier episodes we saw Locke's father perpetrate cons, he was never specifically referred to as a con-man until tonight. Not only that, but we also learned that he's changed his name at least once, so why couldn't he have at some point gone by the name of Sawyer? If this is true, then I fell like this character has some tough times ahead of him, because not only will he have to answer to Locke for his past deeds, but I have to believe Sawyer will get a shot at him as well.
Until Next Time, This season took a huge turn for the better tonight, and I am greatly looking forward to see where it is headed next. If you are behind on, or God forbid have never watched, LOST, what are you waiting for? The first two seasons are on DVD and the entirety of this season is available at abc.com.
Sunday, March 18, 2007
2nd Annual, My Thoughts As I Had Them During the Oscars
Sorry for the lateness of this blog, one might almost say it is pointless now, but I'm putting it up for posterity. Otherwise, next year, I won't be able to call it the Third Annual My Thoughts as I Had Them During The Oscars.
So, without further ado (is that how you spell that?)...
Ellen's starting off nicely, and with an Al Gore joke, I wonder how many of those there are going to be tonight.
Hey, it's Ellen's mom. I've met her.
BOO!! BOO!! Daniel Craig. Where did all the Daniel Craig haters go. Before the movie they were everywhere, now you never hear from them. I'm the lone voice. Daniel Craig is not Bond. I wonder if he's going to pause before he announces the winner. He doesn't when he says Bond James Bond.
Pan's Labyrinth. It was a beautifully shot film.
The good thing about watching the Oscar's on "tape delay" last year is that I didn't have to watch the damn commercials. Remember when commercials for this thing were good? Remember when commercials for the Super Bowl were good?
Will Farrell. It's already funny and he hasn't even done anything yet.
Sweet, Jack Black. Could this get any better?
Just did, John C. Reilly has joined them. Genius.
Okay, I could turn off the TV now, it won't get any better then that bit. Man, those guys are funny.
2 for 2 for Pan's Labyrinth. Why didn't this film get a best pic nod?
How many names did the Fresh Prince give this kid?
Okay, animated shorts, I haven't seen any of them, but from what they just showed I can tell you what won't win.
And it just won. Maybe it's better if you see the whole thing, but that animation looked pretty crappy. Oh, who am I to talk, I can't draw. I wonder if I can win an Oscar with a stick figure animated short?
"Stick-to-it've-ness" Is that really a word? Good speech, though, even with the made up word.
Damn. More commercials.
Okay... This is weird, I'm not gonna lie. A special effects choir? I don't get it. When everyone complains that the Oscars are too long, do we really need time wasters such as special effects choirs?
Wow, they found two seconds of Mark Walberg dialogue without curse words in it. Impressive.
Alan Arkin was by far the best part about this film.
More weird stuff going on, interpretive dancers becoming a penguin? What is the world coming to?
I could really do without the song performances.
Please tell me they aren't going to do all five in a row.
A line in that song was "I think I need to break up." What the hell does that have to do with the environment, Mellissa? Couldn't think of anything else to rhyme with "wake up", could ya? Or did you just write the song in like five minutes?
Thank goodness, a break from the songs.
That was funny. If Al Gore had been this funny six years ago, W and his team wouldn't have been able to steal the election.
"Maybe you should have uglier friends" Nice.
Already positioning to win best Animated Feature next year, Shrek the 3rd.
WHAT? Happy Feet? I mean Cars wasn't as good as some of the other Pixar films from the past, but it has to be better then Happy Feet. Oh my, that guy actually looks like a penguin. Am I the only one who thinks the penguin thing is getting way over done?
This guy just said three major surprises. I'll give him Happy Feet, but I wasn't at all surprised by Alan Arkin, and don't you have to actually see the Animated Shorts in order to be surprised by which one wins. I'm just saying.
Ohh. The Wes Anderson AmEx commercial. I apologize for everything bad I said about having to watch the commercials. The brilliance of this one makes up for all the other crappy ones.
Tom Cruise. Did anyone bring a couch for him to jump around on?
Ellen is doing a great job. And who wouldn't want Spielberg to take the picture?
Did you hear that huge cheer Children of Men got? Way louder then the other nominees. People really loved this movie, justifiably so.
And Pan's is 3 for 3. The only thing more of a lock for a win is Hellen Mirren.
Pirates. Humph. The only good thing about this movie was the effects. Too bad they couldn't create a storyline to go with them. Hee hee. That one made me laugh. Bad form Josh, laughing at your own jokes.
Hey, they brought back the blind kid from the Bronx bit that Ellen did earlier, nice.
Holy Shit. Now THIS is a surprise. Pan's was 3 for 3 coming in and it doesn't win Best For. Film? Did not see that coming at all.
Ah, Jerry doing comedy. All is right with the world again.
Al Gore finally won! Take that W.
God, I hate Celine Dion.
Did they just say "Volverine" Tell me that I misheard that.
Pan's is in a slump. Now 3 for 5, 0 for it's last 2. (man I miss Baseball.)
Well, no clues. Both Departed and Little Miss Sunshine won in their respective screenplays.
Pan a big winner? Yeah it has 3 Oscars, but it missed out on the big one it was up for and is now 0 for it's last 3, I don't like this behind the scenes guy.
Let me guess. We have to hear 3 straight songs.
Well, at least these songs are good. I still have nightmares from 3 6 Mafia.
Did that commercial just show Ally McBeal with Sam Seaborn? Weird.
A lot of introspectives this year.
Sweet, Thelma!! That makes me feel better about Marty's chances.
Hey, Jodie Foster. She also got her start thanks to Martin Scorsese.
Damn it, this part always makes me cry.
Scotty died? How did I miss that? I will refrain from the "Beam me up" joke in honor of his memory.
What? Now Sam Seaborn just said he's a Republican? What the hell show is this commercial for?
Anti-climactic much? They should have just given Helen Mirren the award at the beginning of the show.
I find myself really rooting for Peter O'Toole. There have been bigger surprises tonight.
Oh well, Congrats Forrest. Let's see how the speech goes. He's been getting ridiculed for the ones he's given thus far.
Wow, along with Jennifer Hudson's, I have to say that might be the best of the night.
These are the reasons I want to make movies, right there on stage. (Mainly Lucas, I'm sure that's why they included him.)
Drumroll. I am so nervous right now. Come on Marty!
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm currently envisioning a blue see-through Jedi-like Alfred Hitchcock and Stanley Kubrick up on stage with Copella, Spielberg, Lucas, and Scorsese. The greatest Directors of all time in one place.
I'm crying. I'm so happy for him right now. I really hope Departed wins.
YES, again!!!
Look Spielberg is congratulating Marty for beating him, that's awesome.
Good Oscars.
Until Next Time, it's nice to see that occasionally, the films that deserve to win Oscars do.
So, without further ado (is that how you spell that?)...
Ellen's starting off nicely, and with an Al Gore joke, I wonder how many of those there are going to be tonight.
Hey, it's Ellen's mom. I've met her.
BOO!! BOO!! Daniel Craig. Where did all the Daniel Craig haters go. Before the movie they were everywhere, now you never hear from them. I'm the lone voice. Daniel Craig is not Bond. I wonder if he's going to pause before he announces the winner. He doesn't when he says Bond James Bond.
Pan's Labyrinth. It was a beautifully shot film.
The good thing about watching the Oscar's on "tape delay" last year is that I didn't have to watch the damn commercials. Remember when commercials for this thing were good? Remember when commercials for the Super Bowl were good?
Will Farrell. It's already funny and he hasn't even done anything yet.
Sweet, Jack Black. Could this get any better?
Just did, John C. Reilly has joined them. Genius.
Okay, I could turn off the TV now, it won't get any better then that bit. Man, those guys are funny.
2 for 2 for Pan's Labyrinth. Why didn't this film get a best pic nod?
How many names did the Fresh Prince give this kid?
Okay, animated shorts, I haven't seen any of them, but from what they just showed I can tell you what won't win.
And it just won. Maybe it's better if you see the whole thing, but that animation looked pretty crappy. Oh, who am I to talk, I can't draw. I wonder if I can win an Oscar with a stick figure animated short?
"Stick-to-it've-ness" Is that really a word? Good speech, though, even with the made up word.
Damn. More commercials.
Okay... This is weird, I'm not gonna lie. A special effects choir? I don't get it. When everyone complains that the Oscars are too long, do we really need time wasters such as special effects choirs?
Wow, they found two seconds of Mark Walberg dialogue without curse words in it. Impressive.
Alan Arkin was by far the best part about this film.
More weird stuff going on, interpretive dancers becoming a penguin? What is the world coming to?
I could really do without the song performances.
Please tell me they aren't going to do all five in a row.
A line in that song was "I think I need to break up." What the hell does that have to do with the environment, Mellissa? Couldn't think of anything else to rhyme with "wake up", could ya? Or did you just write the song in like five minutes?
Thank goodness, a break from the songs.
That was funny. If Al Gore had been this funny six years ago, W and his team wouldn't have been able to steal the election.
"Maybe you should have uglier friends" Nice.
Already positioning to win best Animated Feature next year, Shrek the 3rd.
WHAT? Happy Feet? I mean Cars wasn't as good as some of the other Pixar films from the past, but it has to be better then Happy Feet. Oh my, that guy actually looks like a penguin. Am I the only one who thinks the penguin thing is getting way over done?
This guy just said three major surprises. I'll give him Happy Feet, but I wasn't at all surprised by Alan Arkin, and don't you have to actually see the Animated Shorts in order to be surprised by which one wins. I'm just saying.
Ohh. The Wes Anderson AmEx commercial. I apologize for everything bad I said about having to watch the commercials. The brilliance of this one makes up for all the other crappy ones.
Tom Cruise. Did anyone bring a couch for him to jump around on?
Ellen is doing a great job. And who wouldn't want Spielberg to take the picture?
Did you hear that huge cheer Children of Men got? Way louder then the other nominees. People really loved this movie, justifiably so.
And Pan's is 3 for 3. The only thing more of a lock for a win is Hellen Mirren.
Pirates. Humph. The only good thing about this movie was the effects. Too bad they couldn't create a storyline to go with them. Hee hee. That one made me laugh. Bad form Josh, laughing at your own jokes.
Hey, they brought back the blind kid from the Bronx bit that Ellen did earlier, nice.
Holy Shit. Now THIS is a surprise. Pan's was 3 for 3 coming in and it doesn't win Best For. Film? Did not see that coming at all.
Ah, Jerry doing comedy. All is right with the world again.
Al Gore finally won! Take that W.
God, I hate Celine Dion.
Did they just say "Volverine" Tell me that I misheard that.
Pan's is in a slump. Now 3 for 5, 0 for it's last 2. (man I miss Baseball.)
Well, no clues. Both Departed and Little Miss Sunshine won in their respective screenplays.
Pan a big winner? Yeah it has 3 Oscars, but it missed out on the big one it was up for and is now 0 for it's last 3, I don't like this behind the scenes guy.
Let me guess. We have to hear 3 straight songs.
Well, at least these songs are good. I still have nightmares from 3 6 Mafia.
Did that commercial just show Ally McBeal with Sam Seaborn? Weird.
A lot of introspectives this year.
Sweet, Thelma!! That makes me feel better about Marty's chances.
Hey, Jodie Foster. She also got her start thanks to Martin Scorsese.
Damn it, this part always makes me cry.
Scotty died? How did I miss that? I will refrain from the "Beam me up" joke in honor of his memory.
What? Now Sam Seaborn just said he's a Republican? What the hell show is this commercial for?
Anti-climactic much? They should have just given Helen Mirren the award at the beginning of the show.
I find myself really rooting for Peter O'Toole. There have been bigger surprises tonight.
Oh well, Congrats Forrest. Let's see how the speech goes. He's been getting ridiculed for the ones he's given thus far.
Wow, along with Jennifer Hudson's, I have to say that might be the best of the night.
These are the reasons I want to make movies, right there on stage. (Mainly Lucas, I'm sure that's why they included him.)
Drumroll. I am so nervous right now. Come on Marty!
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm currently envisioning a blue see-through Jedi-like Alfred Hitchcock and Stanley Kubrick up on stage with Copella, Spielberg, Lucas, and Scorsese. The greatest Directors of all time in one place.
I'm crying. I'm so happy for him right now. I really hope Departed wins.
YES, again!!!
Look Spielberg is congratulating Marty for beating him, that's awesome.
Good Oscars.
Until Next Time, it's nice to see that occasionally, the films that deserve to win Oscars do.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Oscar Preview and Prediction Post 2006
One of my favorite nights of the year, Oscar night, is finally here. I don't know why I love it so much, I rarely agree with the outcome, and for the second consecutive year only one of my top five is in Oscar's best picture category. Oh well, our disagreements aside, I love the Oscars. Here it is, my predictions...
We'll start with Animated Feature, because it is so simple. CARS will lap the competition. Sorry, I'll try to avoid the cheesy puns from here on out.
Original Song- I have only heard the one from Cars, but I guarantee a victory for one of the songs from DREAMGIRLS. Hey, I've got a three in five chance.
Foreign-language film- It's got to be PAN'S LABYRINTH, although The Lives of Others looks really good, I just don't think it got the attention and exposure to compete with PAN.
Original Screenplay- Probably going to be LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE although it will be the wrong choice. There's a chance for Babel or The Queen here, but either one would represent a huge shift away from Little Miss Sunshine, so I doubt it. It should be Pan's of the five nominees.
Adapted Screenplay- Probably DEPARTED, but Children of Men has a very good shot, because there were a lot of people other then me that felt this was the best movie of the year. A win here could be a consolation prize.
Documentary Feature- Al Gore finally wins. INCONVENIENT TRUTH will win without even needing a recount. I've heard a rumor that Gore will announce he's running for President in 08 in his acceptance speech, could be the highlight of the evening.
All right let's get to the big stuff...
Supporting Actor- I know the majority believes Eddie Murphy here, but I doubt it. It'll be ALAN ARKIN for his lovable but crotchety old Grandpa. That was by far the best part of that movie. After his role was done, the film lost steam quickly in my opinion. If the Departed starts to pull a Return of the King as a sort of career night for Scorsese, Mark Walberg could score an upset. It's a very outside shot though.
Supporting Actress- JENNIFER HUDSON. There are those that feel Dreamgirls should have gotten a best pic nomination, I'm not a big fan of musicals personally, so I don't mind the omission too much, but the Academy will be looking for some way to reward the film. This breakout, scene stealing performance is the best way.
Actor- FOREST WHITAKER. Although Peter O'Toole is a possibility I doubt he'll win due to the honorary Oscar he just received. There could be people voting who want to see him get a real one, so an upset is possible. There is no doubt in my mind that Ryan Gosling is the actor who most deserves it, however.
Actress- HELEN MIRREN. I don't really have anything else to add, they might has well have not even nominated anyone else, that's how much of a lock this is.
Director- MARTIN SCORSESE. Throughout the history of the Oscars people have won for films that are much less impressive then others in their filmogrophies just because they were due, Denzel for Training Day, Russel Crowe for Gladiator, for examples. That tradition will continue today. Actually, I think he best directing job of those nominated belonged to Paul Greenrass for United 93, what could have been done wrong in so many different ways and on so many different levels was handled expertly, but as one of Scorsese's biggest fans, I won't argue with the decision. He's earned it time and time again.
Best Picture-
This race is wide open. The only movie that I can reasonably say won't win it is Letters From Iwo Jima, which is one of the worst movies I have seen in years (although it was better then Pirates of the Caribbean 2). It had its moments, but overall it was poorly done and poorly told. That headache you have? It's from being beaten over the head with the point, they're just like us! The Japanese culture is so prevalent here now, the point this movie made has been rendered pointless. A film from the perspective of Iraqis making the same point, now that would be interesting. Still, even with an unimportant theme, you should still try to make an interesting movie. If they did try, they failed, because this movie was just flat boring.
Everyone else has a chance to win. Babel tried the hardest, and for that it gets some credit, but it fell flat just a few too many times. I have to say, though, if all of the scenes in Japan had been fully from that character's perspective, as in completely silent, it would have made those scenes unbelievably powerful. Add that opportunity lost to too many scenes requiring large leaps of faith (although not nearly to the point as last year's winner, the ridiculous Crash) and the dreary subject matter, I would be surprised if it wins.
The Queen is great on many levels, but ultimately it is more a portrait than a movie (as those involved will gladly point out), so while it has a chance, I'm leaning towards this being a two picture race.
The movie that should win (of the five) is The Departed. There is too much momentum and fervor behind LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE, though and I predict it will walk away with the prize. I thought it was an okay film, and the first half was brilliant. It just goes downhill after Alan Arkin's exit, however as he added heart to the eccentricity without even seeming to try. After that, the attempts at adding heart were heavy handed at best, and the rest of the characters were, in my opinion, far more caricatures rather than characters. Sure, it was an enjoyable film for what it was, but for the life of me I can't understand the hype that this movie is receiving and riding very likely to a Best Picture win. Well, I guess it's better than Iwo Jima.
Until Next Time, enjoy the Oscars, and I'll soon return with my second annual "My Thoughts as I Had Them While Watching the Oscars" post.
We'll start with Animated Feature, because it is so simple. CARS will lap the competition. Sorry, I'll try to avoid the cheesy puns from here on out.
Original Song- I have only heard the one from Cars, but I guarantee a victory for one of the songs from DREAMGIRLS. Hey, I've got a three in five chance.
Foreign-language film- It's got to be PAN'S LABYRINTH, although The Lives of Others looks really good, I just don't think it got the attention and exposure to compete with PAN.
Original Screenplay- Probably going to be LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE although it will be the wrong choice. There's a chance for Babel or The Queen here, but either one would represent a huge shift away from Little Miss Sunshine, so I doubt it. It should be Pan's of the five nominees.
Adapted Screenplay- Probably DEPARTED, but Children of Men has a very good shot, because there were a lot of people other then me that felt this was the best movie of the year. A win here could be a consolation prize.
Documentary Feature- Al Gore finally wins. INCONVENIENT TRUTH will win without even needing a recount. I've heard a rumor that Gore will announce he's running for President in 08 in his acceptance speech, could be the highlight of the evening.
All right let's get to the big stuff...
Supporting Actor- I know the majority believes Eddie Murphy here, but I doubt it. It'll be ALAN ARKIN for his lovable but crotchety old Grandpa. That was by far the best part of that movie. After his role was done, the film lost steam quickly in my opinion. If the Departed starts to pull a Return of the King as a sort of career night for Scorsese, Mark Walberg could score an upset. It's a very outside shot though.
Supporting Actress- JENNIFER HUDSON. There are those that feel Dreamgirls should have gotten a best pic nomination, I'm not a big fan of musicals personally, so I don't mind the omission too much, but the Academy will be looking for some way to reward the film. This breakout, scene stealing performance is the best way.
Actor- FOREST WHITAKER. Although Peter O'Toole is a possibility I doubt he'll win due to the honorary Oscar he just received. There could be people voting who want to see him get a real one, so an upset is possible. There is no doubt in my mind that Ryan Gosling is the actor who most deserves it, however.
Actress- HELEN MIRREN. I don't really have anything else to add, they might has well have not even nominated anyone else, that's how much of a lock this is.
Director- MARTIN SCORSESE. Throughout the history of the Oscars people have won for films that are much less impressive then others in their filmogrophies just because they were due, Denzel for Training Day, Russel Crowe for Gladiator, for examples. That tradition will continue today. Actually, I think he best directing job of those nominated belonged to Paul Greenrass for United 93, what could have been done wrong in so many different ways and on so many different levels was handled expertly, but as one of Scorsese's biggest fans, I won't argue with the decision. He's earned it time and time again.
Best Picture-
This race is wide open. The only movie that I can reasonably say won't win it is Letters From Iwo Jima, which is one of the worst movies I have seen in years (although it was better then Pirates of the Caribbean 2). It had its moments, but overall it was poorly done and poorly told. That headache you have? It's from being beaten over the head with the point, they're just like us! The Japanese culture is so prevalent here now, the point this movie made has been rendered pointless. A film from the perspective of Iraqis making the same point, now that would be interesting. Still, even with an unimportant theme, you should still try to make an interesting movie. If they did try, they failed, because this movie was just flat boring.
Everyone else has a chance to win. Babel tried the hardest, and for that it gets some credit, but it fell flat just a few too many times. I have to say, though, if all of the scenes in Japan had been fully from that character's perspective, as in completely silent, it would have made those scenes unbelievably powerful. Add that opportunity lost to too many scenes requiring large leaps of faith (although not nearly to the point as last year's winner, the ridiculous Crash) and the dreary subject matter, I would be surprised if it wins.
The Queen is great on many levels, but ultimately it is more a portrait than a movie (as those involved will gladly point out), so while it has a chance, I'm leaning towards this being a two picture race.
The movie that should win (of the five) is The Departed. There is too much momentum and fervor behind LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE, though and I predict it will walk away with the prize. I thought it was an okay film, and the first half was brilliant. It just goes downhill after Alan Arkin's exit, however as he added heart to the eccentricity without even seeming to try. After that, the attempts at adding heart were heavy handed at best, and the rest of the characters were, in my opinion, far more caricatures rather than characters. Sure, it was an enjoyable film for what it was, but for the life of me I can't understand the hype that this movie is receiving and riding very likely to a Best Picture win. Well, I guess it's better than Iwo Jima.
Until Next Time, enjoy the Oscars, and I'll soon return with my second annual "My Thoughts as I Had Them While Watching the Oscars" post.
Saturday, February 24, 2007
Top Ten and Other Movie News From 2006
Here it is, my definitive list for the Top Ten Films of 2006. But before we get to the main attraction, there are a few honorable mentions to give out. So, without further adue, my review of 2006 in the Movies.
Honorable mentions...
1. Superman Returns- I really liked this movie; I mean, sure there were problems, but it was a return to the Superman I grew up with. I thought Brandon Routh was at times so eerily similar to Christopher Reeve it almost seemed like he was channeling him. The effects were spectacular. It might have cracked the top ten if I had seen the 3d version.
2. Clerks II- Fantastic return to form for Kevin Smith. It's not that we don't think you can do movies without Jay and Silent Bob, it's that we just don't want you to. Features a great tell your friends about it moment when Randal reenacts the Lord of the Rings trilogy and a so gross you aren't sure you should laugh moment involving a donkey. If there hadn't been another comedy that also had great tell your friends about it moments and an even more gross so you aren't sure you should laugh moment, this might have made the top ten.
3. The Illusionist- A great movie in many respects. A good story line and fantastic acting (even by Mary Camdon) just aren't enough to overcome the fact that it was predictable. My poor friend Danie had to hear the entire rest of the plot about 20 minutes in. It was still enjoyable, and for the people who didn't see the twists coming a mile away, I wouldn't be surprised if it were much higher on the list.
Just Missing the Top Ten
The Queen- Helen Mirren is incredible, and the movie is very well done. I didn't think I would enjoy it as much as I did. I was disappointed with the Prince Charles character, I never really believed it was him, whereas sometimes with the Queen and Tony Blair I would forget they were actors. Very interesting film, gave me a perspective on the British royalty I hadn't really considered before (granted, I hadn't really considered the British Royal Family at all.) It felt like an episode of the West Wing at times as well, and I don't mean that disparagingly.
Blood Diamond- I had this in the top ten until a few days ago. This was a great year for movies, and so some are unfortunately going to be left of the list. This movie was great because it took a very serious subject that many of us probably don't know too much about and made a fantastic action thriller out of it. Leo was amazing in this film, and my respect for him as an actor grows more and more with every new role he takes.
And now, the actual TOP TEN LIST 2006....
10--BORAT
Funny, challenging, disgusting: this movie can be described in many different ways. Ultimately, I'm most impressed with Sacha Baron Cohen's ability to disappear so completely within the character that you forget he's just an actor. I also applaud him for showing us the uglier sides of our selves, but also for giving us a good laugh at the same time. And while Clerks II had its tell your friends moments, Borat was full of them from beginning to end. I know, because I was at a party the day after I saw it, and along with some others who had seen it, we ended up retelling pretty much the entire film while laughing hysterically. And if you want a gross don't know whether to laugh or puke moment, naked wrestling is for you.
9--THE PRESTIGE
After I saw it, I couldn't stop analyzing it. Like the Illusionist, it was a good story on a great subject (magic) with amazing acting (come on who doesn't want to see Wolverine vs. Batman?) but it also had one of the most talented young directors working today, Christopher Nolan (Memento), and he did a fantastic job with this film. And unlike the Illusionist, there were plenty of things that had me scratching my head until the reveal. A film much like a magic trick, plus it had Scarlett Johanssen. Mmmm, Scarlett.
8--THANK YOU FOR SMOKING
This was the funniest movie of the year, in my opinion. The fact that it came out so early is probably the only thing costing it Oscar recognition. The performances are top notch, even by Mrs. Cruise who makes you forget she was ever Joey. The script has just the right amount of heart to go with the huge helping of parody, satire, and sarcasm that it serves in no doubt unhealthy portions. It manages to have a happy ending without being cheesy or too syrupy (unlike the comedy Oscar is favoring) and totally stays true to itself at the end as a good satire should.
7--THIS FILM IS NOT YET RATED
A must for anyone interested in the film industry. This could be one of the most important films in regard to the film industry ever. This is the movie that caused the MPAA to break there own strict no piracy rule and make an illegal copy. There were many revelations in this film that shocked and surprised me, and by no means am I ignorant to the industry. And it is as funny as it is unsettling. The subject matter was handled expertly. Documentaries can be difficult in pacing and in storytelling, but this one got it just right. As soon as I finished watching it, I started it again and watched it with the commentary.
6--PAN'S LABYRINTH
Gloriously beautiful, and with a Wizard of Oz-esque storyline, this was a fabulous film. The only reason it's not much higher is the amount of violence. While I understand the need for the violence in this film, in part because of the time period of the story, and also to highlight the difference in the little girl's fantasy world and the real world, I also felt that at times it was more graphic then it needed to be. Overall though, the look of the film was exquisite, and the acting was top notch. I also loved the ending, you weren't sure what to believe, leaving it up to your judgement as to whether it was really a happy ending or not.
5--A SCANNER DARKLY
Finally, the way to make Keanu a good actor, draw over his scenes. Done in the style of Waking Life (also directed by Richard Linkletter) this movie was sort of made twice. They filmed it as live action, then with a computer animation program, actually animated it on top of the film itself, lending a surreal feel to the film. It's an animated film, and yet at the same time it seems like live action. This approach worked perfectly for this story, based very faithfully on the novel by Phillip K. Dick. A movie about drugs, family, and reality, it succeeds on all levels, even with Keanu. I've had it from Netflix since December. I really need to buy my own copy and send this one back.
4--UNITED 93
Originally, I had no desire to see this. I thought it was too soon, and imagined that the film would be preachy and overly patriotic. It is neither. It is filmed in documentary, you-are-there style, and runs in near to real time, adding to its effectiveness. The film not only focuses on what happened on the one hijacked flight that failed to make it to its destination, but also in the main control room for the FAA, the headquarters of the military's air defense, and the air traffic control towers of New York, Boston, and Cleveland, giving us a very real look at what was happening behind the scenes on that fateful morning. A very powerful movie that I liked in spite of myself.
3--THE DEPARTED
Many are calling this a return to form for Martin Scorsese, but personally, I feel that The Aviator and Gangs of New York were both better films then this one. And by no means is this film in the class of Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, Goodfellas, or Mean Streets, but it is still a really great movie. In almost anyone else's hands, this would have been strictly a genre picture, but under Scorsese's skilled direction, it is a masterpiece. There are so many nuanced and breathtaking performances in this film, I don't know how only Mark Walberg is nominated. The only thing that held the film back for me was the performance of Matt Damon. At times he was good, but at times I had a really hard time believing him. Mainly every time he had to show indignation or anger. I think he's much better when he's restrained such as in Talented Mr. Ripley. The rest of the films strengths, however, more then make up for Damon's negatives.
AND THE NUMBER ONE FILMS....
That's right, there's a tie. I've been trying for nearly a month to decide which film I liked better, but I believe both are utterly brilliant. It's rare that two films in one year would become among the greatest films I've ever seen, but that's the case here.
THE FOUNTAIN
I list this one first since I previously blogged about it. My feelings for it have not changed. Feel free to go back and read what I wrote right after I saw it. It's rare for a movie to leave itself so open for interpretation, but it is awesome when it is done right, and The Fountain does it right. There is little doubt in my mind that Darren Aronofsky(Requiem For a Dream, Pi) is one of the finest directors of all time.
CHILDREN OF MEN
So is Alfonso Cuaron (Harry Potter and the Prisoner form Azkaban, Y Tu Mama Tambien). He tackles huge and troubling subjects with real and tangible characters even in unfamiliar places. In this film, he makes a possible future seem all too terrifyingly real in a documentary/noir/post-apocalyptic sci-fi film that stays with you long after the credits roll. The fact that Michael Caine isn't being mentioned for a best supporting actor borders on criminal as he steals every scene that he's in, managing to provide the film's funniest moments as well as it's saddest. Ultimately, it isn't too hard to imagine such a future as being possible, and it reminds us not to lose sight of or take for granted the hope that we do have.
Until next time, get caught up on your movie watching, because the Oscars are Sunday, and my predictions are forthcoming.
On a sadder note, my thoughts and prayers go out to TCU alum and reigning NFL MVP Ladanian Tomlinson and his family. His father died Friday afternoon in a car crash just south of Waco.
Honorable mentions...
1. Superman Returns- I really liked this movie; I mean, sure there were problems, but it was a return to the Superman I grew up with. I thought Brandon Routh was at times so eerily similar to Christopher Reeve it almost seemed like he was channeling him. The effects were spectacular. It might have cracked the top ten if I had seen the 3d version.
2. Clerks II- Fantastic return to form for Kevin Smith. It's not that we don't think you can do movies without Jay and Silent Bob, it's that we just don't want you to. Features a great tell your friends about it moment when Randal reenacts the Lord of the Rings trilogy and a so gross you aren't sure you should laugh moment involving a donkey. If there hadn't been another comedy that also had great tell your friends about it moments and an even more gross so you aren't sure you should laugh moment, this might have made the top ten.
3. The Illusionist- A great movie in many respects. A good story line and fantastic acting (even by Mary Camdon) just aren't enough to overcome the fact that it was predictable. My poor friend Danie had to hear the entire rest of the plot about 20 minutes in. It was still enjoyable, and for the people who didn't see the twists coming a mile away, I wouldn't be surprised if it were much higher on the list.
Just Missing the Top Ten
The Queen- Helen Mirren is incredible, and the movie is very well done. I didn't think I would enjoy it as much as I did. I was disappointed with the Prince Charles character, I never really believed it was him, whereas sometimes with the Queen and Tony Blair I would forget they were actors. Very interesting film, gave me a perspective on the British royalty I hadn't really considered before (granted, I hadn't really considered the British Royal Family at all.) It felt like an episode of the West Wing at times as well, and I don't mean that disparagingly.
Blood Diamond- I had this in the top ten until a few days ago. This was a great year for movies, and so some are unfortunately going to be left of the list. This movie was great because it took a very serious subject that many of us probably don't know too much about and made a fantastic action thriller out of it. Leo was amazing in this film, and my respect for him as an actor grows more and more with every new role he takes.
And now, the actual TOP TEN LIST 2006....
10--BORAT
Funny, challenging, disgusting: this movie can be described in many different ways. Ultimately, I'm most impressed with Sacha Baron Cohen's ability to disappear so completely within the character that you forget he's just an actor. I also applaud him for showing us the uglier sides of our selves, but also for giving us a good laugh at the same time. And while Clerks II had its tell your friends moments, Borat was full of them from beginning to end. I know, because I was at a party the day after I saw it, and along with some others who had seen it, we ended up retelling pretty much the entire film while laughing hysterically. And if you want a gross don't know whether to laugh or puke moment, naked wrestling is for you.
9--THE PRESTIGE
After I saw it, I couldn't stop analyzing it. Like the Illusionist, it was a good story on a great subject (magic) with amazing acting (come on who doesn't want to see Wolverine vs. Batman?) but it also had one of the most talented young directors working today, Christopher Nolan (Memento), and he did a fantastic job with this film. And unlike the Illusionist, there were plenty of things that had me scratching my head until the reveal. A film much like a magic trick, plus it had Scarlett Johanssen. Mmmm, Scarlett.
8--THANK YOU FOR SMOKING
This was the funniest movie of the year, in my opinion. The fact that it came out so early is probably the only thing costing it Oscar recognition. The performances are top notch, even by Mrs. Cruise who makes you forget she was ever Joey. The script has just the right amount of heart to go with the huge helping of parody, satire, and sarcasm that it serves in no doubt unhealthy portions. It manages to have a happy ending without being cheesy or too syrupy (unlike the comedy Oscar is favoring) and totally stays true to itself at the end as a good satire should.
7--THIS FILM IS NOT YET RATED
A must for anyone interested in the film industry. This could be one of the most important films in regard to the film industry ever. This is the movie that caused the MPAA to break there own strict no piracy rule and make an illegal copy. There were many revelations in this film that shocked and surprised me, and by no means am I ignorant to the industry. And it is as funny as it is unsettling. The subject matter was handled expertly. Documentaries can be difficult in pacing and in storytelling, but this one got it just right. As soon as I finished watching it, I started it again and watched it with the commentary.
6--PAN'S LABYRINTH
Gloriously beautiful, and with a Wizard of Oz-esque storyline, this was a fabulous film. The only reason it's not much higher is the amount of violence. While I understand the need for the violence in this film, in part because of the time period of the story, and also to highlight the difference in the little girl's fantasy world and the real world, I also felt that at times it was more graphic then it needed to be. Overall though, the look of the film was exquisite, and the acting was top notch. I also loved the ending, you weren't sure what to believe, leaving it up to your judgement as to whether it was really a happy ending or not.
5--A SCANNER DARKLY
Finally, the way to make Keanu a good actor, draw over his scenes. Done in the style of Waking Life (also directed by Richard Linkletter) this movie was sort of made twice. They filmed it as live action, then with a computer animation program, actually animated it on top of the film itself, lending a surreal feel to the film. It's an animated film, and yet at the same time it seems like live action. This approach worked perfectly for this story, based very faithfully on the novel by Phillip K. Dick. A movie about drugs, family, and reality, it succeeds on all levels, even with Keanu. I've had it from Netflix since December. I really need to buy my own copy and send this one back.
4--UNITED 93
Originally, I had no desire to see this. I thought it was too soon, and imagined that the film would be preachy and overly patriotic. It is neither. It is filmed in documentary, you-are-there style, and runs in near to real time, adding to its effectiveness. The film not only focuses on what happened on the one hijacked flight that failed to make it to its destination, but also in the main control room for the FAA, the headquarters of the military's air defense, and the air traffic control towers of New York, Boston, and Cleveland, giving us a very real look at what was happening behind the scenes on that fateful morning. A very powerful movie that I liked in spite of myself.
3--THE DEPARTED
Many are calling this a return to form for Martin Scorsese, but personally, I feel that The Aviator and Gangs of New York were both better films then this one. And by no means is this film in the class of Taxi Driver, Raging Bull, Goodfellas, or Mean Streets, but it is still a really great movie. In almost anyone else's hands, this would have been strictly a genre picture, but under Scorsese's skilled direction, it is a masterpiece. There are so many nuanced and breathtaking performances in this film, I don't know how only Mark Walberg is nominated. The only thing that held the film back for me was the performance of Matt Damon. At times he was good, but at times I had a really hard time believing him. Mainly every time he had to show indignation or anger. I think he's much better when he's restrained such as in Talented Mr. Ripley. The rest of the films strengths, however, more then make up for Damon's negatives.
AND THE NUMBER ONE FILMS....
That's right, there's a tie. I've been trying for nearly a month to decide which film I liked better, but I believe both are utterly brilliant. It's rare that two films in one year would become among the greatest films I've ever seen, but that's the case here.
THE FOUNTAIN
I list this one first since I previously blogged about it. My feelings for it have not changed. Feel free to go back and read what I wrote right after I saw it. It's rare for a movie to leave itself so open for interpretation, but it is awesome when it is done right, and The Fountain does it right. There is little doubt in my mind that Darren Aronofsky(Requiem For a Dream, Pi) is one of the finest directors of all time.
CHILDREN OF MEN
So is Alfonso Cuaron (Harry Potter and the Prisoner form Azkaban, Y Tu Mama Tambien). He tackles huge and troubling subjects with real and tangible characters even in unfamiliar places. In this film, he makes a possible future seem all too terrifyingly real in a documentary/noir/post-apocalyptic sci-fi film that stays with you long after the credits roll. The fact that Michael Caine isn't being mentioned for a best supporting actor borders on criminal as he steals every scene that he's in, managing to provide the film's funniest moments as well as it's saddest. Ultimately, it isn't too hard to imagine such a future as being possible, and it reminds us not to lose sight of or take for granted the hope that we do have.
Until next time, get caught up on your movie watching, because the Oscars are Sunday, and my predictions are forthcoming.
On a sadder note, my thoughts and prayers go out to TCU alum and reigning NFL MVP Ladanian Tomlinson and his family. His father died Friday afternoon in a car crash just south of Waco.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)