Tuesday, February 15, 2011

DVD of Christmas Barely Past



I received my BluRay copy of Doctor Who: A Christmas Carol today, and it is without question the best Christmas special of the new series.  It is, unlike the majority of the Tennant Christmas Specials, actually Christmas-y.  Taking for its base the awesome classic Dickens tale, and adding in time-travel, cryogenically frozen beautiful opera singers, Jaws-like flying sharks, and a potential crash for a luxury liner, the special hits on every mark.  It is hilarious, exhilarating, beautifully shot, expertly acted, and has just the right amount of Christmas special emotionality.  And the BluRay version of the film looks absolutely gorgeous!

Luckily, the price on this release is pretty low, because there isn't that much extra on the release, and honestly, this is probably going to be on the Series 6 DVD and BluRay releases.

There is a making of special, Doctor Who Confidential, and a musical special, Doctor Who at the Proms 2010.  The plus is that both are also offered in 1080i on the BluRay release.

The Proms is fantastic, as the music featured is from the fifth series, which is, I think, the best the music has been since the series returned in 2005.  I owned the Series 1 soundtrack, and was content with that even with the release of the Series 2, 3, and 4 soundtracks.  When the Series 5 soundtrack was released last week, I bought it without a second thought.  The new Doctor's theme is so beautiful and haunting.  Having an orchestral show featuring that music along with characters and scenes from the last series of Doctor Who is worth the purchase price to me.

The making of is as good as any of the others you have seen if you've watched any Doctor Who Confidentials.  It is a well made, hour long, making of, and worth seeing.

Ultimately, since the price is so affordable, this is worth purchasing, but if you plan on buying the Series 6 release towards the end of this year, waiting for this special to be on that release would be forgivable.  And if you just can't wait to own this, but don't want to pay 10-15 dollars for it with so few extras, the special is also available on iTunes.

Until Next Time, However you decide to go, I think that the release is worth spending less than 20 dollars on, especially in BluRay for the fantastic transfer of the special in HD, and for the hour long Proms featuring the fantastic score from Series 5.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Doctor Who: The Movie





There has been a lot of talk with the super successful return to television of the Doctor (and if you aren't watching, you really need to get on that, the first four seasons of NuWho are all on Netflix Instant Viewing) of the last attempt to bring the Doctor and his blue box back to our television screens.

The show had lasted from 1963 until 1989, had seven actors play the titular Time Lord,

William Hartnell (1963-1966)
Patrick Troughton (1966-1969)

Jon Pertwee (1970-1974)

Tom Baker (1974-1981)

Peter Davison (1981-1984)

Colin Baker (1984-1986)

Sylvester McCoy (1987-1989)
and told 155 stories through 694 episodes, but BBC was through with the show.

Classic Who was pretty low budget, and with the advent of Star Trek: The Next Generation and its fancy graphics, the BBC felt that the money necessary to produce Doctor Who at a high level simply wasn't feasible for the amount of attention that the show was getting.  There just wasn't the interest in the show that there had once been, and Colin Baker (the sixth Doctor) and Sylvester McCoy (the seventh Doctor) weren't as highly acclaimed as some of their predecessors, leading the powers that be at the Beeb to decide that perhaps it was time that the Doctor took a break, perhaps even a permanent one.

Cut to 1996 and with the help of Universal Studios and the FOX network, a new Doctor Who was produced as a back door pilot to a possible new series that would run on FOX and BBC.

While the movie did extremely well in the UK, it didn't do as well in the US, running against the final ever episode of Rosanne.

Since that airing, it has been very hard to find the episode here, although there have been various releases in the UK.

Until this week, that is, when the Special Edition DVD was finally released here.

There are a lot of people who really don't like the TV movie, and there are reasons to be a little skeptical, but overall, it is a fun story.  It is an outstanding bridge between Classic Who and the new series that has run for the past six years.  There is a lot in it that seems to have inspired Davies in the modernization of the character and the feel of the show now as compared to Classic Who, (for instance, the Doctor has kissed every female companion, and one male companion since the 8th Doctor kissed Grace in the television movie).

Sure there are some troubling parts, such as the subplot of the film which seems to indicate that the Doctor is half human (on his mother's side), but I think it is pretty simple to say that the Master is incorrect about his opinion of the Doctor's ancestry and that the Doctor is joking when he talks about it himself.

Take out that problematic plot point, and the story, while certainly weak at points and nonsensical in others, is still a lot of fun.  It isn't really that much more far fetched than some of the stories that we've gotten recently, but it is as exciting and whimsical as Doctor Who should be.

Paul McGann (1996)


Paul McGann is beyond fantastic, and if there had been more Who with the Eighth Doctor, he very well could have become my favorite.  He has a great handle on the role and makes you believe that he is the Doctor.  Sure, we're only a few hours away from the end of the world, his arch-nemesis the Master is intent on stealing his body and TARDIS, and he just regenerated into a new body, but that doesn't mean that we can't have a little fun and excitement in the process!  Paul McGann brings the necessary gravitas to the upcoming end of the world and brings a lighthearted whimsy to adventure at the same time.  I literally can't say enough how much I enjoyed his performance and lament the fact that we didn't get a chance to see him in the role a little longer, although I suppose that that is always possible in the future, and the 50th anniversary is coming up.

Overall, I think that the film is a lot of fun, a definite worthwhile addition to anyone's Doctor Who collection.

The huge plus to getting this special edition DVD, however, is definitely the special features.  There are a ton of them.

There are a couple of documentaries that are definitely worth your time.

The first is the nearly one hour long making of called The Seven Year Hitch, which chronicles the efforts of Philip Segal to get the rights to the show that he loved as a child and produce it in for an American audience in cooperation with the BBC.  It is a great look at the lengths that Segal went to in order to get Doctor Who back on the air as well as an explanation for why it didn't stay on the air.

The other great documentary is The Wilderness Years which looks at the fans love for the show despite its absence from the telly and the ways that the Doctor remained in our consciousness such as the books, audio plays, the magazine, comic strips, and fan made films.

There are also some other interesting bits throughout the other special features.  For instance, in Who Peter, a look at the relationship between Doctor Who and a British children's program entitled Blue Peter.  The interesting part about that documentary is the way that the relationship has been updated with the return of Doctor Who.  I'm not sure why this documentary is on this DVD release as it might fit better on a series from the new Who, but I'm glad I saw it.  I gained a new appreciation for one of my least favorite episodes for the nuWho, Love and Monsters, thanks to this documentary.

Watching the screen tests for Paul McGann reiterate how amazing I think that he would have been as the Doctor for a longer period of time, but also how glad I am that Segal's vision isn't the one that ultimately forged the future for Doctor Who.  The whole Doctor being half-human thing is clearly where he wanted to go with the role (as well as having the Doctor and the Master being half-brothers).  His ultimate storyline involved the Doctor searching for his father.  Personally, I don't think that it would have been a great choice, and the way things stand right now are much better for the show and for the character, but I still am a little saddened by the small taste of Paul McGann that we are left with.

Although there are a lot of audio adventures, novels, and comic strips continuing the adventures of the Eighth Doctor, some of which you can learn about in some of the other fantastic extras on this two disc set.

Until Next Time, A Christmas Carol, Matt Smith's first special is released next week, and I will review the special and the DVD (well, I'm getting it on BluRay, but you know) release for you then!

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Oscar Nominations and the Films of 2010

Oscar nominations were announced yesterday, and despite the fact that it was unquestionably a down year for film, the Academy still managed to find ten films to nominate for Best Picture.

The idea of rather or not we really need to nominate ten films every year is one I will hold off on until another post, and instead in this post we will just take a look at the nominations and see if there are any glaring mistakes on the list.  (We will also hold off until the big Oscar preview and prediction post to give any deeper thoughts on who should win and who will win.)

BEST PICTURE

  • Winter's Bone
    For the most part there are no surprises here.  With ten nominees, it becomes more dificult to leave out a really deserving film, especially in a year in which there weren't that many great films, although some people seem to be a little surprised that The Town didn't receive a nomination.  However, I think a better case could be made for Shutter Island.  The thing with both films, though, is that they were released very early in the year, and that is always a deterrent towards getting recognized for awards.  While both were good films (and Shutter Island will probably make my top ten) neither are so amazing that it is preposterous that they didn't get nominations, even with there being ten nominations now.

    When we can really begin to question some things is when we get into the nominated directors.

    DIRECTING


    • True Grit
       
      Obviously, the Coens, Aronofsky, and Fincher have to be here.  I haven't seen The Fighter or The King's Speech yet, but due to the fact that The King's Speech leads all the nominees, it can't be surprising that Hooper is here.  The big omission is, of course, Christopher Nolan, director of Inception.  I haven't made my top ten for the year yet (there are still a few films I need to see, and I want to watch some of them over again before I commit), but there is still definitely a chance that Inception ends up in the top spot (although, to be honest, I'm leaning towards The Social Network).  To not have the director of what is unquestionably one of the finest films of the year nominated for best director is unbelievable.

      Unless you are going to expand this category as well (and perhaps it is a bit ironic that it is Nolan being left out, since it was the fact that The Dark Knight, also directed by Nolan, was left off of the Best Picture list a couple of years ago that gave us the ten best picture nods we have right now) someone would have to be left out in order to put Nolan in.

      Personally, I would have put Nolan on the list in the place of Russell.  As much as people do seem to have enjoyed The Fighter, I doubt that there would have been too much uproar if Nolan had been nominated and Russell had not been.

      Another category with a pretty glaring (or at least surprising) omission is the Documentary Feature category.

      DOCUMENTARY FEATURE


      What is surprising is the fact that this year there was a documentary that got a lot of attention and pub, and usually when that happens, not only is that documentary nominated, it usually wins. (Think Fahrenheit 911.)  This year, that film was without question Waiting For Superman, and yet there are no nominations for Waiting For Superman at all.

      Having not seen any of the nominated films for Best Documentary, I can't say that the five films nominated aren't more deserving than Waiting For Superman, but I certainly find the omission of Waiting For Superman as a surprising one, if only because of all of the notice that it got.  That much attention for a documentary is usually more than enough to at least get it a nomination, especially when it is a very fine film.

      The final category that I have real issue with is the Animated Film category.
       

      ANIMATED FEATURE FILM


      • Toy Story 3
        While the whole conversation is moot, since there is no doubt that Toy Story 3 is going to win this category, there were actually a couple of other animated films that were very outstanding this year, primarily MegaMind and Despicable Me

        I don't know that you can say the films nominated shouldn't be, but MegaMind and Despicable Me both clearly deserved nominations as well.  With the advances of computer animation in the last 15 years (and can you believe that Toy Story came out over 15 years ago?) each year seems to have a few outstanding films in the animated category.  This might have been the best year for animated films (a little ironic considering that films as a whole weren't very good this year).  Personally, I think that it might be time to expand the animated category to five films instead of just three.  If there aren't five films that deserve nomination in a year, there is no problem with only nominating three in that year.  This year, however, I think that five films easily could have been nominated in this category, and MegaMind and Despicable Me deserved to be among them.

        Until Next Time, now that we know what's nominated, I have some more movie watching to do in order to give you a full and complete Oscar Preview and Prediction Post, and then, of course, there will be my latest Thoughts As I Had Them During the Oscars Post as we watch the Oscars on Feb 27th!

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Why I Love Genre Shows

This is ostensibly my review of the fantastic new television show based on the graphic series The Walking Dead



and I promise that the review will be in here, but I also wanted to talk about the reason shows such as this,



Star Trek,



 and Battlestar Galactica



are so amazing on more than just a "they're so cool and exciting" level.

I think that a lot of people view genre shows in that vein.  Science Fiction and Fantasy based television shows aren't always given the credit that many of them deserve, credit for being about real issues and taking a hard look at those issues.  They take a hard look at issues that we often have a hard time looking at objectively, either because we disagree so vehemently on them as a society or because they are issues that are just uncomfortable to talk about.

Battlestar Galactica is still the best show ever on television in my opinion.  It is a show that might have taken place in space, far away from our world in both space and time, but that isn't really the point of the show at all.

The show was about what it means to be human, about religion and what religion has the power to make us do and believe, about war and the lengths that we will go if we believe we are faced with our own end, and about all of the social issues that we are dealing with in this place and this time.

Sure, it was a Science Fiction television show, but if you really look at what they were saying, there are deep issues being discussed.

For instance, the show was aired during the Bush era, while we were embroiled in a war that many felt was unjust in Iraq.  The show had a President who got the job through questionable means, who was a religious fundamentalist, who believed that personal liberties could and should be put aside for the "greater good", and yet the President was portrayed as a very likable character, and is generally considered good.

On the other hand, the show has the human characters acting against an occupying force that has a different religion, an occupying force that is ostensibly there for the benefit of those being occupied.  The humans rise up in insurgency and terrorism against the occupiers, and the viewers root for them.  Remember, this show was on the air during the time of the Iraqi war.  The show actually has the viewers rooting for the Iraqi insurgents against the American occupiers!

So the show basically has you sympathizing with Iraqi insurgents as well as sympathizing and rooting for President Bush.  It allows you to look at the other side and perhaps understand where others are coming from regardless of where you stand politically.

Sure, Star Trek is pretty cheesy in a lot of aspects if you go back and watch it now, but look at what the show was saying in the time in which it was on the air.

The show made a real effort to show people from different cultures all working together on the crew of the Enterprise, and the First Officer wasn't even from the same planet!

War and money were outdated concepts for the people of Earth and the other cultures that were a part of the Federation of Planets.

The show featured the first interracial kiss on television!

Meanwhile, in the world at large at the time, we were engaged in the Vietnam War and the Civil Rights Movement.

Sure, Star Trek was a cheesy sci-fi western/adventure show, but it was also very much in response to these issues that the world was dealing with at the time.  As great as The Andy Griffith Show was, they weren't dealing with these issues, and wouldn't have been allowed to if they wanted to.

Sci-Fi and fantasy get to side-step the fact that television that is supposedly for entertainment shouldn't be dealing with those types of troubling issues because genre shows are so otherworldly (for lack of a better term) that there is enough distance from the issues being examined, that it isn't as uncomfortable.

And that brings me to AMC's new television show, The Walking Dead.

There have been three episodes so far, and there are three more until the first season is over.

AMC has already picked up the show for a second season.

Sure, it is a show about Zombies, and if you're into that, you will not be disappointed, but I would argue that it is also about much more.

Obviously it is about survival, but also about what we (as a species) are capable of doing to each other in order to survive.  What horrible, monstrous things are we humans capable of when pushed?

Ultimately, are we really any better than the zombies?

These are some of the issues that the show has posited thus far.

Add to these interesting questions and issues, the fact that the show is exquisitely shot (the pilot was directed by Frank Darabont, he of The Shawshank Redemption and The Green Mile), superbly acted, and the writing is pitch perfect.

I can't think of another time when I was so emotionally invested in a television show, that a moment in the first act of the third episode had me crying.

If you haven't checked out The Walking Dead yet, I hope that you'll consider it.

If you weren't going to watch it because you don't like genre shows, I hope you'll reconsider that as well.  Genre shows might be the only shows that really get to examine the issues, situations, and realities that we need to examine and we discuss, and they do it in a way that allows there to be unbiased and rational discussion, which seems to be impossible in the world as it is stands right now.

Until Next Time, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part One in 36 hours as of this writing!

Friday, October 29, 2010

It's Always Funny in Philadelphia






Last night's "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" was, without question, one of the series's finest.

The story-telling was probably the best that the show has ever had, and yet the wacky comedy didn't suffer from story at all.

(From this point on there will be spoilers)

The big question from the episode is: Who is Sweet Dee's Baby Daddy?

Talking about this with my good friend Justin (from the outstanding Cavemen Go), he brought up an idea he has for an upcoming blog of his own where he would think of awesome stunt castings for some of his favorite shows.  This is a great idea, and I am greatly looking forward to his blog on that very subject, but I thought, while we wait, we should come up with the top 5 stunt casting choices for Sweet Dee's Baby Daddy.

5. Ben Stiller
The episode began with the gang talking about spending the night at the museum (which would also be a hilarious episode, I kind of hope that we get that one some day), so, of course, I thought about Ben Stiller.  His comedic timing would fit in nicely with this crowd, and that would have been an awesome easter egg if the guys knew they were bringing in Ben Stiller to be Sweet Dee's Baby Daddy.


4. Jonathan Lajoie (Taco from The League)
Taco is the greatest character on the greatest show about Fantasy Football ever.  (Seriously, it is scary how much this show often matches a league that I am in [GO WILD OLIVES!]).  Jonathan Lajoie (pronounced Lajwa) steals every single scene that he is in, and not only would he do the same on Sunny, he would also bring more attention to the hilarious show that follows it.


3. Ricky Gervais
Mainly because I love him, and want him to be on every comedy, because he can only make it funnier.  (He's also my choice to replace Michael Scott on NBC's The Office, but to do so as David Brent, the character that Michael Scott is based on.)  Just imagining Ricky Gervais's expressions when listening to Dennis, Mac, Charlie, and Frank already have me cracking up.


2. Arnold Schwarzenegger
Justin's choice for some great stunt casting.  This would be hilarious on numerous levels.  A: It's the Govenator, so that would be awesome, B: The comedic stylings of Schwarzenegger and Sunny star Danny DeVito are well documented.  And this wouldn't be the first time that Schwarzenegger and DeVito have had to deal with an impending birth.  I can see it now, AH-nold could play Frank's (twin?) brother, the uncle that Sweet Dee had always had a huge crush on, and since 7th Heaven turned out to be Dennis and Sweet Dee's real dad, there wouldn't be anything too wrong with it (at least not to these depraved people).


And my number one choice would be the man of whom there is a statue in Philadelphia....

1. Sylvester Stalone (better known as Rocky Balboa)

Mainly, because I want to see a boxing match between Sly and Dennis.

Until Next Time, what do you think?  Who should play Sweet Dee's Baby Daddy?  Or should it be someone on the show already?

Friday, October 1, 2010

Facebook Me





I remember when I first heard that there was going to be a movie about Facebook, (And I love that spell check still doesn't think that facebook is a word.  There is actually a bit about that in the movie if you watch closely) I thought that a movie about facebook would be a ridiculous idea.  I mean you might as well have Zach Snyder (director of 300 and Watchmen) direct a kids' movie!  (Oh, wait.)

Then I began to hear a little bit more about it.  I heard that David Fincher's name was attached.  He is one of five directors working today that I will go see anything that he does.  (Another future post?)  Then I heard that Aaron Sorkin would be writing.  (He's got a nice cameo by the way.  And the script is clearly his.  You West Wing fans, and Sports Night [What What!], will really enjoy it.)  At that point I was incredibly intrigued.

Then I began to hear what the movie would be about, and I realized that this wasn't so much a movie based on facebook the website as it was a movie about what went into the making of facebook, which honestly, is a movie about our society today, our obsessions, who we are, what we want from the internet, and the type of person you have to be to recognize those needs, obsessions, and wants, and then deliver them to us.

This movie is fascinating.  It is a character study first and foremost.  Mark Zuckerberg, in the film, is an intriguing character.  He is portrayed by Jesse Eisenberg with great results.  I have heard Eisenberg referred to as a Michael Cera type actor, but the depth that Eisenberg brings to this role outweighs anything that Cera has done to date (which, as much as I enjoyed Arrested Development, is really just varying versions of George Michael.)  The film seems to make a case (although not in an obvious or heavy handed way, but the signs are there if you care to look for them) that Zuckerberg has Asperger's.  I have no idea if he actually does, but I don't doubt at all the film meant for those signs to be there, despite not coming right out and saying it.  While Zuckerberg definitely doesn't come off as a hero in the film, and is definitely portrayed somewhat as an asshole, he is also the protagonist of the film, and you can't help but root for him and find him likable (at the same time you think, "wow, what an asshole.")  This is due, in large part, to the outstanding job that Eisenberg does in portraying him.

Speaking of great acting performances, Justin Timberlake steals every single scene that he is in.  He is phenomenal as Napster.com creator Sean Parker.  I would be shocked if he doesn't recieve at least a nomination for Best Supporting Actor, and I wouldn't be shocked at all if he somehow manages to win.  After all, Mo'Nique is an Oscar winner now, why not Justin Timberlake?  But seriously, he is unbelievable.  I had been impressed with him in small roles prior to this (most notably in Black Snake Moan) but he blew me away with this performance.

David Fincher was as incredible as you would expect.  His work is flawless and phenomenal, and the texture, presence, and depth that he is able to add with his visuals is beyond reproach.  He is simply one of the best directors working today.

And, as I mentioned earlier, the screenplay is vintage Sorkin.  No one writes dialogue like Aaron, and no one makes talking sound as good.  If only the real world sounded like it does in Sorkin's mind.  Alas, we will have to settle for the complete series of Sports Night and West Wing, and movies such as this.

In a year where Hot Tub Time Machine has a legitimate shot to make my Top Ten (seriously, this year has been terrible for film so far), I am glad that there is finally an actual outstanding movie to recommend (along with Toy Story 3 and Inception, everything else this year has been, at best, okay).

Until Next Time, Go see this film, and then I'll see you on Facebook.

Friday, September 3, 2010

Why Kristen Bell is SOOOOO Awesome

Have you watched Veronica Mars?  Because you absolutely should.  One of the best television shows of all time, and the first season is, in my opinion, one of the best seasons of a television show of all time, probably in the top five (a future post, perhaps?).



Clearly it is time for you catch up on this fantastic show, and thankfully, Netflix is here to help you with that, as all three seasons are now on Instant Viewing.

That isn't the reason that I am writing today, however.  Since the series was canceled a few years ago, there has been a persistent rumor that there will be a Veronica Mars movie at some point.  The actors are all on board, as is the creator of the show Rob Thomas (not the same as the one from Matchbox Twenty, but the one who also created the fantastic show Cupid... twice).

The problem is that Warner Bros. who owns the property isn't sure that the movie would make money (although I'm sure I'd see it numerous times) and therefore isn't worth making.

Kristen Bell, who rocketed to stardom last year in Forgetting Sarah Marshall but to those of us who watched Veronica Mars was a star far earlier, disagrees with Warner Bros. and has gone to Twitter to ask that Warner Bros. either acknowledge that there is an audience for this film or let the project go so that it can be made independently.

From her Twitter @IMKristenBell

  1. #veronicamars fans send petitions & any obsessive behaior u have 2 @wbpictures & demand the film. they c no audience 4 it? i beg 2 differ.
  2. mars fans-can we bug @wbpictures & tell em the must do a VM film?? new tactic. bombard em w/tweets, theres evidence of fans they cant ignore
Kristen Bell doesn't need Veronica Mars, she is turning into a chick flick star and could easily do those types of films for the next fifteen to twenty years, but she knows what a great character Veronica is and how strongly the fans of the show want more from the smart and sassy (and Battlestar Galactica quoting) Veronica Mars.

If you want to get in on this, and really why wouldn't you, send @wbpictures telling them so with the hashtag #veronicamarsmovie

And join this Facebook group while you're at it!

Until Next Time, So glad that Kristen Bell is as on board as we are with this dream.. Let's make it happen!

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Josh Man Vs. the World

The title of this post is because I am apparently the only one that didn't like Scott Pilgrim.

Now, let me tell you why....

First, I am probably the prime audience for this movie, although I have not read (and now don't plan to read) the graphic novel on which it is based.  I am, however, a fan of Edgar Wright (the director), a fan of comic books and the movies that are made from them, and, most importantly for this film, a fan of video games, because this film is really just a film version of a video game.

Despite all of that going for me, I really disliked this movie.

The story is horrendous.  The plot, beyond just being pretty sexist, is not that engaging and doesn't make a ton of sense.  I've been told that if I had read the graphic novel it would make a lot more sense, but in order to make a decent adaptation, one needs to understand the movie without having read the source material, and that isn't really possible here.  (Slight *Spoilers* here) Why does Scott Pilgrim see Romona in his dreams, how is able to fight off all of the first exes without any explanation when we see where his ability to defeat the last one comes from, why is the world and specifically Scott Pilgrim's life being akin to a video game not a surprise to anyone?  Because it is clear from the scenes in the film that all video game like action is not just in Scott's head.

Overall, the film tries WAAAAAY too hard.  It wants to be visually stunning, but in my opinion is more often than not annoying.  Some (my girlfriend) have tried to convince me that this movie is an attack on hipsters, and while I agree that might be a theme in this movie (even the most important one) that doesn't forgive the film for how hard it works to say "I'm cool, if you're cool you will like me!"  I'm sorry, when you work that hard to seem cool, you don't appear cool, I just pity you.

As I said earlier, I love video games, but the video games that I like generally have a good story, I don't like them because there are boss fights or because of experience points or because of any of the video game type things that happen in this film, I like them because of good gameplay, sure, but primarily because of story, and this film does not have a strong story at all.

It seems to me (and again, I haven't read the graphic novel) that the story was an after thought, and that the writers mainly wanted to focus the project around the idea of using the language and structure of video games.  I think using that structure and the language of video games that all of us who game a lot would know and immediately recognize is a good idea, but that in doing so it should be because it serves and accentuates the story, not try and fit the story (such as it is) around it.

This has been a down year for movies thus far, and I had high hopes for this one (I don't even hate Michael Cera as much as some people do, although I admit that he has only ever played George Micheal Bluth), but it did not live up to those hopes, at least for me.

Until Next Time, If you liked it, I'm glad that you did, but it isn't a film that worked for me.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Big News on the Doctor Who Front

I haven't done as much on this blog thus far on talking about television news, but it is part of what I occasionally want to cover, especially when it has a big effect on television shows that I absolutely love, in this case, the longest running Sci-Fi show in all of history, Doctor Who...


Before I get to the news on this fantastic (and fantastical) show, I want to talk a little bit about the last season, the first since the Doctor came back without Russell T. Davies in charge, the first under Stephen Moffat.

While some people I know didn't enjoy the Moffat run series as much as they did the Davies run seasons prior to it (featuring Christopher Eccleston for a year, and David Tennant for four, three series and a series of specials), most critics praised this last season, and I agree.  While I (and I'm sure most fans of the Doctor would agree) am a huge fan of Tennant's incarnation, and despite my enjoyment of Matt Smith, he's no David Tennant, the overall story of the series was the best of the new run, in my opinion.  I am a fan of a series (or season as we say in the good ol' U S of A) that is truly serial, where each episode works with each other and towards a specific end.  There are no throw-away episodes, no "time-wasters".

I thought the last season's story was incredibly imaginative, and the finale was fantastic, one of the best in quite some time.

So, the big news of the last couple of days for Doctor Who is that next season will be split into two stories with a break in the middle allowing for a cliff-hanger episode.  An interview with Moffat from The Guardian broke this news.  The Doctor will return to the air for seven episodes, concluding with "an earth shattering climax", a "game-changing cliffhanger", then going on hiatus until the autumn when the show will return with six more episodes (ostensibly telling a different story coming out of the game-changer that occurred in the mid-season finale) culminating in the season finale.  The Doctor will then return on Christmas with the Christmas special.

The departure of the fantastic David Tennant also meant that ratings weren't as strong as they were in the final Tennant year, so the hope is that with double the "event" episodes, the premiere, a mid-season finale, the autumn premiere, and the season finale (instead of just one premiere and finale we now have two of each), the ratings overall will be stronger.

Personally, I am not a fan of splitting a season in two, with a hiatus in the middle, and this is what Heroes attempted to do in its last couple of seasons, and that didn't work out so well at all.  However, I think that we can all agree that the stories on Doctor Who under Moffat are much better than anything on Heroes after season one.  Doctor Who is a much better show, and so the failure of Heroes shouldn't really have anything to do with this decision in regards to Doctor Who.

A major plus, of course, is that while the number of episodes doesn't change, there will be new Doctor Who throughout the year.  We "are never going to be more than [a] few months from the new series of Doctor Who."  And as an impatient person, that is an exciting thing.

The other thing to talk about with this news is, of course, what the "earth shattering climax", the "game-changing cliffhanger" will be.  Will it result in the actual, unchangeable death of a companion?  Something that is very rare in the world of Doctor Who, and hasn't occurred in quite some time.  Really only one major companion has died (although a few others who haven't traveled as long with the Time Lord have also died), Aldric who was a companion of the fourth and fifth Doctor throughout seasons 18, 19, and 21.  So if Amy Pond is killed off, that would be a game-changer.

A bigger game-changer, of course, would be the Doctor regenerating into a woman, but that probably won't happen anytime soon.

Until Next Time, Whatever happens, Moffat won me over last season, and I look forward to what he does next with the series.

Friday, August 27, 2010

LOST The New Man in Charge, first thoughts

SPOILERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



No, seriously... SPOILERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Okay, if you are still here, then I will assume that you have watched the entirity of LOST and perhaps watched this special as well.

On the LOST Season 6 Blu Ray, there is a special feature from after Dr. Jack's death (What? I told you there were spoilers!) entitled The New Man in Charge. It looks at the time on the Island with Ben working for Hurley.

If you are one of the people who complained about the number of answers neglected in the finale, this less than fifteen minutes will probably be exactly what you wanted. Tons of "questions" are answered in the special, and there are also a lot of good little LOST in jokes.

While most people will focus on the answers provided, I want to talk a little bit about the jokes, because the sense of humor in LOST is a part of the show that I loved, but never really spent much time talking about.

First, the special makes fun of its own purpose, the fact that there are questions that people want answers to that the show itself didn't have enough time to divulge. When the DHARMA workers ask who Ben is and what he is doing there, Ben replies, "I'm tying up a few loose ends."

While watching the Hydra Orientation video, Dr. Chang actually uses his real name, but he asks that those watching not give it out as he would hate to have to use an alias in the future, which, of course, we know that he does. The reveal is handled in a very amusing aside, which I really liked. If you really had to know why Chang always uses a different name in the videos, now you know, otherwise, it was an amusing joke.

The next reveal also made me laugh, as we got the reappearance of the Hurley Bird, which is called a Hy-Bird by the DHARMA folk.

And by the way, how awesome was the Polar Bear worker who apparently got a little too close to the Bears referenced by the loss of his arm. A nice little foreshadowing for Chang himself.

Just after the video ends, Hector references one of my all time favorite LOST moments, saying, "I think we're gonna need to see that again." That was of course the first thing that Locke said after watching the first orientation video we saw way back in season 2.

Finally, Ben goes to our favorite mental institution and we find our favorite kidnappee, which leads to the great moment of Walt asking Ben if he is there to kidnap him again.

Tons of questions were answered, and it was great to have some new LOST if only for 12 minutes, the only problem is that it raised another huge question that apparently we will never get an answer to...

Until Next Time, how in the world did they get a DHARMA Van to present day Los Angeles?

Josh Man